Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29275438›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017

Effect of hydrophobic surface treated fumed silica fillers on a one-bottle etch and rinse model dental adhesive.

Jing Wang, Qingsong Yu, Zhiyuan Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing WangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. wajing@missouri.edu.
Qingsong YuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Zhiyuan YangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of hydrophobic surface treatment to fumed silica fillers on the bonding performance of a one-bottle etch and rinse model dental adhesive. In this study, 0.5-5 wt.% of Filler 1 and Filler 2 were loaded into BisGMA/HEMA model dental adhesive. Filler 1 was not treated, while Filler 2 was surface treated with a dimethyl silicone fluid making the silica extremely hydrophobic. The prepared adhesives were characterized through measurements of viscosity, degree of conversion, and water contact angle. SEM was utilized to observe the microstructures at the bonding interface. Micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) test coupled with fracture surface analysis was carried out to study the mechanical properties. From the experiment, the loadings of Filler 2 is favorable to the improvement of µTBS. The µTBS of experimental adhesive with 1 wt.% Filler 2 increased 42% compared to the model adhesive without filler, and 24% compared to the experimental adhesive with 1 wt.% Filler 1. The effectively penetration of the hydrophobic compositions of the adhesive is considered as the main reason that leads to the increased bond strength, which was proved by the contact angle measurement and SEM observations.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAnimalsCattleDental CementsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSilicon DioxideSiliconesSurface PropertiesTensile StrengthToothViscosityAdhesivesDental CementsSilicon DioxideSilicones

Identifiers

PMID29275438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.