Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29275302›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Evaluation of Vascular Proliferation in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Ionela Sevilla Bujor, Andreea Cioca, Raluca Amalia Ceaușu, Fulga Veaceslav, Cristian Nica, Anca Maria Cîmpean, Marius Raica

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic Significance of Microvessel Density in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2023
    Article
  6. Association Between Vascular Index MeasuredFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Engineering Breast Cancer On-chip-Moving Toward Subtype Specific Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ionela Sevilla BujorDepartment of Histology, Angiogenesis Research Center, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Andreea CiocaDepartment of Histology, Angiogenesis Research Center, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania cioca_andre@yahoo.com.
Raluca Amalia CeaușuDepartment of Histology, Angiogenesis Research Center, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Fulga VeaceslavDepartment of Histology, Cytology and Embryology, Nicolae Testemitanu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Cristian NicaDepartment of Surgery, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Anca Maria CîmpeanDepartment of Histology, Angiogenesis Research Center, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Marius RaicaDepartment of Histology, Angiogenesis Research Center, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RONicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy · MD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis plays a pivotal role in tumor development. Although microvessel density (MVD) is the most common method used for evaluation of angiogenesis, it has several limitations. Our aim was to evaluate MVD and microvessel proliferation (MVP) in a series of invasive breast carcinomas and analyze whether angiogenesis is influenced by the molecular phenotype of each tumor. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe examined vascular proliferation using double immunohistochemistry (CD34/Ki67) in a series of 54 invasive breast carcinomas and compared the results with standard MVD, molecular subtypes and other classical parameters.

resultsIncreased MVD and MVP values were recorded in basal-like subtype, but only the MVP value reached significance among this group of patients (p=0.0001). For all cases combined, increased MVP was significantly correlated with negative estrogen receptor (ER) status (p=0.010) and higher histological grade (p=0.002).

conclusionMVP more accurately reflects the state of angiogenesis in breast cancer, compared with standard MVD. Vascular proliferation was associated with aggressive tumor features, indicating its contribution to tumor progression. The strong association between vascular proliferation and basal-like tumors suggests that this marker can be used for stratification of patients who might benefit from therapies targeting angiogenesis.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CD34Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMicrovesselsMiddle AgedNeovascularization, PathologicPrognosisAntigens, CD34Ki-67 AntigenangiogenesisBreast cancerimmunohistochemistrymicrovesselsvascular proliferation

Identifiers

PMID29275302
PMCPMC5892637
OpenAlexW2776662508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.