ArticleJournal of environmental management2018
Harnessing landscape heterogeneity for managing future disturbance risks in forest ecosystems.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stand and Landscape Drivers of Trap Captures of the Pine Wilt Disease VectorEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Finding common ground: Toward comparable indicators of adaptive capacity of tree species to a changing climate.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.Ecology and evolution · 2021Review
- The Vision of Managing for Pest-Resistant Landscapes: Realistic or Utopic?Current forestry reports · 2021Review
- Reducing rotation age to address increasing disturbances in Central Europe: Potential and limitations.Forest ecology and management · 2020Article
- Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species-diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Effects of disturbance patterns and deadwood on the microclimate in European beech forests.Agricultural and forest meteorology · 2020Article
- Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix.Ambio · 2020Review
- Norway spruce at the trailing edge: the effect of landscape configuration and composition on climate resilience.Landscape ecology · 2020Article
- What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?Forest ecology and management · 2019Article
- A scalable model of vegetation transitions using deep neural networks.Methods in ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.Agricultural and forest meteorology · 2018Article
- Trade-offs between temporal stability and level of forest ecosystem services provisioning under climate change.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to prevent irreversible impacts of climate change on the biosphere it is imperative to phase out the use of fossil fuels. Consequently, the provisioning of renewable resources such as timber and biomass from forests is an ecosystem service of increasing importance. However, risk factors such as changing disturbance regimes are challenging the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services, and are thus a key concern in forest management. We here used simulation modeling to study different risk management strategies in the context of timber production under changing climate and disturbance regimes, focusing on a 8127 ha forest landscape in the Northern Front Range of the Alps in Austria. We show that under a continuation of historical management, disturbances from wind and bark beetles increase by +39.5% on average over 200 years in response to future climate change. Promoting mixed forests and climate-adapted tree species as well as increasing management intensity effectively reduced future disturbance risk. Analyzing the spatial patterns of disturbance on the landscape, we found a highly uneven distribution of risk among stands (Gini coefficients up to 0.466), but also a spatially variable effectiveness of silvicultural risk reduction measures. This spatial variability in the contribution to and control of risk can be used to inform disturbance management: Stands which have a high leverage on overall risk and for which risks can effectively be reduced (24.4% of the stands in our simulations) should be a priority for risk mitigation measures. In contrast, management should embrace natural disturbances for their beneficial effects on biodiversity in areas which neither contribute strongly to landscape-scale risk nor respond positively to risk mitigation measures (16.9% of stands). We here illustrate how spatial heterogeneity in forest landscapes can be harnessed to address both positive and negative effects of changing natural disturbance regimes in ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.