Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274727›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole versus clopidogrel alone or aspirin and dipyridamole in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia (TARDIS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial.

Philip M Bath, Lisa J Woodhouse, Jason P Appleton, Maia Beridze, Hanne Christensen, Robert A Dineen, Lelia Duley, Timothy J England, Katie Flaherty, Diane Havard and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. The role ofExpert review of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Effect of prior antiplatelet therapy on recurrence in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia: data from the triple antiplatelets for reducing dependency after ischaemic stroke (TARDIS) randomised trial.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Differential effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel by homocysteine levels on risk of recurrent stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Impact of body mass index on efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA.The New England journal of medicine · 2018 · on this map
    Trial

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk.
Lisa J WoodhouseStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jason P AppletonStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Maia BeridzeHospital of War Veterans, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Hanne ChristensenBispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robert A DineenRadiological Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lelia DuleyNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Timothy J EnglandVascular Medicine, Division of Medical Sciences & GEM, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Katie FlahertyStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Diane HavardStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stan HeptinstallStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Marilyn JamesHealth Economics, Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kailash KrishnanStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Hugh S MarkusStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stuart J PocockDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Marc RandallDepartment of Neurology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Annemarei RantaDepartment of Neurology, Wellington Hospital and University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Thompson G RobinsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Polly ScuttStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Graham S VenablesDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Nikola SpriggStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
TARDIS Investigators
Leeds General Infirmary · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellington Hospital · NZ

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/08/083/25779Department of Health 10/104/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive antiplatelet therapy with three agents might be more effective than guideline treatment for preventing recurrent events in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole) with that of guideline-based antiplatelet therapy.

methodsWe did an international, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial in adult participants with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 48 h of onset. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer randomisation to receive loading doses and then 30 days of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin 75 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily) or guideline-based therapy (comprising either clopidogrel alone or combined aspirin and dipyridamole). Randomisation was stratified by country and index event, and minimised with prognostic baseline factors, medication use, time to randomisation, stroke-related factors, and thrombolysis. The ordinal primary outcome was the combined incidence and severity of any recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic; assessed using the modified Rankin Scale) or TIA within 90 days, as assessed by central telephone follow-up with masking to treatment assignment, and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN47823388.

findings3096 participants (1556 in the intensive antiplatelet therapy group, 1540 in the guideline antiplatelet therapy group) were recruited from 106 hospitals in four countries between April 7, 2009, and March 18, 2016. The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee. The incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA did not differ between intensive and guideline therapy (93 [6%] participants vs 105 [7%]; adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·67-1·20, p=0·47). By contrast, intensive antiplatelet therapy was associated with more, and more severe, bleeding (adjusted cOR 2·54, 95% CI 2·05-3·16, p<0·0001).

interpretationAmong patients with recent cerebral ischaemia, intensive antiplatelet therapy did not reduce the incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA, but did significantly increase the risk of major bleeding. Triple antiplatelet therapy should not be used in routine clinical practice.

fundingNational Institutes of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, British Heart Foundation.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAspirinBrain IschemiaClopidogrelDenmarkDipyridamoleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGeorgiaHemorrhageHumansIschemiaIschemic Attack, TransientMaleMiddle AgedAspirinClopidogrelDipyridamolePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID29274727
PMCPMC5854459
OpenAlexW2779726076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.