Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274616›Full record

SynthesisSocial science & medicine (1982)2018

Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review.

Vadim Dukhanin, Alexandra Searle, Alice Zwerling, David W Dowdy, Holly A Taylor, Maria W Merritt

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Happiness and air quality: microdata analysis in Indonesia.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Air Pollution Impairs Subjective Happiness by Damaging Their Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vadim DukhaninDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alexandra SearleDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alice ZwerlingDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; School of Epidemiology, Public Health & Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Holly A TaylorDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Maria W MerrittJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: mmerrit2@jhu.edu.

Funding

Assessing Social Justice in Economic Evaluation to Scale up Novel MDR-TB RegimensR01AI114458 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOWDY, DAVID WESLEY · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social justice is the moral imperative to avoid and remediate unfair distributions of societal disadvantage. In priority setting in healthcare and public health, social justice reaches beyond fairness in the distribution of health outcomes and economic impacts to encompass fairness in the distribution of policy impacts upon other dimensions of well-being. There is an emerging awareness of the need for economic evaluation to integrate all such concerns. We performed a systematic review (1) to describe methodological solutions suitable for integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation, and (2) to describe the challenges that those solutions face. To be included, publications must have captured fairness considerations that (a) involve cross-dimensional subjective personal life experience and (b) can be manifested at the level of subpopulations. We identified relevant publications using an electronic search in EMBASE, PubMed, EconLit, PsycInfo, Philosopher's Index, and Scopus, including publications available in English in the past 20 years. Two reviewers independently appraised candidate publications, extracted data, and synthesized findings in narrative form. Out of 2388 publications reviewed, 26 were included. Solutions sought either to incorporate relevant fairness considerations directly into economic evaluation or to report them alongside cost-effectiveness measures. The majority of reviewed solutions, if adapted to integrate social justice concerns, would require their explicit quantification. Four broad challenges related to the implementation of these solutions were identified: clarifying the normative basis; measuring and determining the relative importance of criteria representing that basis; combining the criteria; and evaluating trade-offs. All included solutions must grapple with an inherent tension: they must either face the normative and operational challenges of quantifying social justice concerns or accede to offering incomplete policy guidance. Interdisciplinary research and broader collaborations are crucial to address these challenges and to support due attention to social justice in priority setting.

Indexed as

Social JusticeCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansPublic HealthEconomic evaluationEquity weightingFairnessHealthcare policyMulticriteria decision analysisPriority settingSocial justiceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29274616
PMCPMC6545595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.