Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274502›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm.

E Feczko, N M Balba, O Miranda-Dominguez, M Cordova, S L Karalunas, L Irwin, D V Demeter, A P Hill, B H Langhorst, J Grieser Painter and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autism Sensory Profiles Predict Stimulus- Evoked Insula Connectivity.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

E FeczkoDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, 97239, USA. Electronic address: feczko@ohsu.edu.
N M BalbaDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
O Miranda-DominguezDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
M CordovaDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
S L KaralunasDepartment of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
L IrwinDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
D V DemeterThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, Austin, TX 78713, USA.
A P HillDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Center for Spoken Language Understanding, Institute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
B H LanghorstDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
J Grieser PainterDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
J Van SantenDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Center for Spoken Language Understanding, Institute on Development & Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
E J FombonneDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
J T NiggDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
D A FairDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Identification of outcome-based sub-populations using deep phenotyping and precision functional mapping across ADHD and ASDR01MH096773 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DOSENBACH, NICO, FAIR, DAMIEN A · 2012 to 2024
$9.4M
Brain trajectories in ADHDR01MH115357 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FAIR, DAMIEN A, NIGG, JOEL T · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
Intergenerational Effects of Maternal Childhood Trauma on the Fetal BrainR01MH105538 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BUSS, CLAUDIA, FAIR, DAMIEN A · 2015 to 2019
$3.5M
ADHD biotypes using genetic and imaging approachesR01MH099064 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGG, JOEL T · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Longitudinal Imaging Study of ADHD Brain DevelopmentR01MH086654 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGG, JOEL T · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Functional Circuits as an Endophenotype for ADHD in ChildrenR00MH091238 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FAIR, DAMIEN A · 2011 to 2013
$723k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH091238NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086654NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096773NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099064NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105538NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115357NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) comprises a set of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in social communication and interaction and repetitive behaviors or restricted interests, and may both affect and be affected by multiple cognitive mechanisms. This study attempts to identify and characterize cognitive subtypes within the ASD population using our Functional Random Forest (FRF) machine learning classification model. This model trained a traditional random forest model on measures from seven tasks that reflect multiple levels of information processing. 47 ASD diagnosed and 58 typically developing (TD) children between the ages of 9 and 13 participated in this study. Our RF model was 72.7% accurate, with 80.7% specificity and 63.1% sensitivity. Using the random forest model, the FRF then measures the proximity of each subject to every other subject, generating a distance matrix between participants. This matrix is then used in a community detection algorithm to identify subgroups within the ASD and TD groups, and revealed 3 ASD and 4 TD putative subgroups with unique behavioral profiles. We then examined differences in functional brain systems between diagnostic groups and putative subgroups using resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rsfcMRI). Chi-square tests revealed a significantly greater number of between group differences (p < .05) within the cingulo-opercular, visual, and default systems as well as differences in inter-system connections in the somato-motor, dorsal attention, and subcortical systems. Many of these differences were primarily driven by specific subgroups suggesting that our method could potentially parse the variation in brain mechanisms affected by ASD.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAutism Spectrum DisorderBrainChildConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAutismFunctional connectivityMRIRandom forestsSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID29274502
PMCPMC5969914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.