Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274279›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular biochemistry2018

RBM10: Harmful or helpful-many factors to consider.

Julie J Loiselle, Leslie C Sutherland

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin BNature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Vitamin BResearch square · 2025
    Article
  7. LncRNAJournal of virology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie J LoiselleHealth Sciences North Research Institute (HSNRI), Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie C SutherlandHealth Sciences North Research Institute (HSNRI), Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-1834
Health Sciences North · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RBM10 is an RNA binding motif (RBM) protein expressed in most, if not all, human and animal cells. Interest in RBM10 is rapidly increasing and its clinical importance is highlighted by its identification as the causative agent of TARP syndrome, a developmental condition that significantly impacts affected children. RBM10's cellular functions are beginning to be explored, with initial studies demonstrating a tumor suppressor role. Very recently, however, contradictory results have emerged, suggesting a tumor promoter role for RBM10. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on RBM10, and address this dichotomy in RBM10 function. Furthermore, we discuss what may be regulating RBM10 function, particularly the importance of RBM10 alternative splicing, and the relationship between RBM10 and its paralogue, RBM5. As RBM10-related work is gaining momentum, it is critical that the various aspects of RBM10 molecular biology revealed by recent studies be considered moving forward. It is only if these recent advances in RBM10 structure and function are considered that a clearer insight into RBM10 function, and the disease states with which RBM10 mutation is associated, will be gained.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingClubfootHeart Defects, CongenitalMutationPierre Robin SyndromeRNA-Binding ProteinsAnimalsHumansStructure-Activity RelationshipRBM10 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsRBM10RBM5regulationRNA binding proteinsSMNTARP

Identifiers

PMID29274279
PMCPMC5901003
OpenAlexW2779522923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.