Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274118›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2018

Cost comparison by treatment arm and center-level variations in cost and inpatient days on the phase III high-risk B acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial AALL0232.

Amanda M DiNofia, Alix E Seif, Meenakshi Devidas, Yimei Li, Matthew Hall, Yuan-Shung V Huang, Viviane Cahen, Stephen P Hunger, Naomi J Winick, William L Carroll and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The effectiveness and safety of antibody induction immunosuppression in a large cohort of United States pediatric liver transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda M DiNofiaDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-0403
Alix E SeifDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Meenakshi DevidasDivision of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Yimei LiDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew HallChildren's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas.
Yuan-Shung V HuangCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Viviane CahenDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen P HungerDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Naomi J WinickDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
William L CarrollPerlmutter Cancer Center Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Brian T FisherDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eric C LarsenDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Maine Medical Center, Scarborough, Maine.
Richard AplencDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders · USChildren's Hospital Association · USMaine Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
CANCER CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009679 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Richard Aplenc, Karen Glanz · 1992 to 2026
$11.1M
Pediatric Pharmacoepidemiology Training ProgramT32HD064567 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ADAMSON, PETER C., HENNESSY, SEAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009679NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD064567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) develops and implements multi-institutional clinical trials with the primary goal of assessing the efficacy and safety profile of treatment regimens for various pediatric cancers. However, the monetary costs of treatment regimens are not measured. AALL0232 was a COG randomized phase III trial for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia that found that dexamethasone (DEX) was a more effective glucocorticoid than prednisone (PRED) in patients younger than 10 years, but PRED was equally effective and less toxic in older patients. In addition, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) led to better survival than escalating doses of methotrexate (C-MTX). Cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System database were merged with clinical data from the COG AALL0232 trial. Total and component costs were compared between treatment arms and across hospitals. Inpatient costs were higher in the HD-MTX and DEX arms when compared to the C-MTX and PRED arms at the end of therapy. There was no difference in cost between these arms at last follow-up. Considerable variation in total costs existed across centers to deliver the same therapy that was driven by differences in inpatient days and pharmacy costs. The more effective regimens were found to be more expensive during therapy but were ultimately cost-neutral in longer term follow-up. The variations in cost across centers suggest an opportunity to standardize resource utilization for patients receiving similar therapies, which could translate into reduced healthcare expenditures.

Indexed as

Drug CostsHealth ExpendituresHospital CostsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsparaginaseChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDexamethasoneDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesAsparaginaseDexamethasoneLeucovorinMethotrexatepegaspargasePolyethylene GlycolsPrednisoneChildclinical trialcostsleukemiavariation

Identifiers

PMID29274118
PMCPMC5773964
OpenAlexW2779973765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.