Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29274083›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2018

Different views of dentists and general medical practitioners on dental care for patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary heart diseases: results of a questionnaire-based survey in a district of Germany.

Dirk Ziebolz, Lucie Reiss, Gerhard Schmalz, Felix Krause, Rainer Haak, Rainer F Mausberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk ZiebolzDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Lucie ReissDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard SchmalzDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Felix KrauseDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rainer HaakDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rainer F MausbergDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the views of dentists (Ds) and general medical practitioners (GPs) on different aspects of dental care for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or coronary heart disease (CHD).

methodsReliable and comparable questionnaires for Ds and GPs, with 23 questions, were sent to 1,000 randomly selected Ds and 1,000 randomly selected GPs. Questions were asked about patients with DM or CHD regarding their dental care and potentially related issues (e.g. antibiotic prophylaxis). The responses received within 12 weeks were evaluated and statistically analysed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests (P < 0.05).

resultsThe response rate was 39% (n = 391) for Ds and 18% (n = 181) for GPs. Both groups stated that they used the medical history as well as patient interviews to assess patients. However, only 55% of Ds assumed correct identification of every at-risk patient compared with 100% of GPs (P < 0.01). Furthermore, Ds speculated that they inform their patients more often about their at-risk status than do GPs (P < 0.01). Neither Ds nor GPs appeared to be confident in their knowledge about adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. Interdisciplinary collaboration was considered insufficient, although Ds had a higher rate of regular collaboration (68% for Ds vs. 40% for GPs; P < 0.01).

conclusionDs and GPs have differing views on dental care of patients with DM or CHD, and Ds showed more interest in this issue. These results might partially explain the insufficient collaboration between Ds and GPs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDental CareDiabetes ComplicationsInterdisciplinary CommunicationAntibiotic ProphylaxisCoronary DiseaseDentistsDiabetes MellitusGeneral PractitionersGermanyHumansPractice Patterns, Dentists'Referral and ConsultationRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairescoronary heart diseasesDental carediabetes mellitusinterdisciplinary collaboration

Identifiers

PMID29274083
PMCPMC9378880
OpenAlexW2776936724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.