Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2019
Outcome of "treat and monitor" regimen of aflibercept and ranibizumab in macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of as-needed intravitreal injection compared to 3-monthly loading of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for branch retinal vein occlusion.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Navigated laser and aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion: A 12-month randomized trial.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Trial
- Short-term outcomes of aflibercept biosimilar SB15 in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Burden of Aflibercept 2 mg and Ranibizumab in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Comparison of efficacy of conbercept, aflibercept, and ranibizumab ophthalmic injection in the treatment of macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion: a Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Effects of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and aflibercept for branch retinal vein occlusion on the choroid: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Twenty-four-month results of intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Efficacy of Modified Treat-and-Extend Aflibercept Regimen for Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 1-Year Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- A Real-Life Study: Intravitreal Aflibercept, Ranibizumab and Dexamethasone for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Beyoglu eye journal · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy of a modified PRN treatment regimen ("treat and monitor") of aflibercept and ranibizumab in macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion.
methodsSeventy eyes of 70 patients with treatment naïve branch retinal vein occlusion were enrolled. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravitreal aflibercept (34 eyes) and ranibizumab (36 eyes) with a "treat and monitor" treatment regimen with monthly follow-up for 12 months. Primary outcome measures included mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at month 12 compared to baseline.
resultsAt 12 months follow-up, the mean BCVA improved from 0.58 ± 0.13 to 0.20 ± 0.15 logMAR (P = 0.0003) in the aflibercept group (mean injections 2.6 ± 1.51) and from 0.52 ± 0.11 to 0.21 ± 0.1 logMAR (P = 0.0002) in the ranibizumab group (mean injections 2.8 ± 1.78). No statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the visual acuity gains in eyes with macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO treated with either aflibercept or ranibizumab was observed. Mean CFT reduced from 498 ± 46 to 204 ± 23 µm (P < 0.0001) in the aflibercept group and from 488 ± 31 to 212 ± 29 µm (P < 0.0001) in the ranibizumab group.
conclusion"Treat and monitor" regimen is a real-life effective strategy in improving visual acuity after macular edema from branch vein occlusion and in reducing the number of injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.