Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273958›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Biomarkers in breast cancer: A consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.

R Colomer, I Aranda-López, J Albanell, T García-Caballero, E Ciruelos, M Á López-García, J Cortés, F Rojo, M Martín, J Palacios-Calvo

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. SEOM-GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. SEOM‑GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (update 2026).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  17. Molecular Modelling a Key Method for Potential Therapeutic Drug Discovery.Biomedical journal of scientific & technical research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R ColomerDepartamento de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, C/Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain. rcolomer@seom.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-3444
I Aranda-LópezPathology Department, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
J AlbanellMedical Oncology Department, Mar University Hospital, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Pompeu Fabra University, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain.
T García-CaballeroPathology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
E CiruelosMedical Oncology Department, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
M Á López-GarcíaPathology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, CIBERONC, Seville, Spain.
J CortésMedical Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
F RojoPathology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
M MartínMedical Oncology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
J Palacios-CalvoPathology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, CIBERONC, IRYCIS and University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. jose.palacios@salud.madrid.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This consensus statement revises and updates the recommendations for biomarkers use in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, and is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology. This expert group recommends determining in all cases of breast cancer the histologic grade and the alpha-estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, Ki-67 and HER2 status, in order to assist prognosis and establish therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (MammaPrint

Indexed as

Decision MakingBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalSpainBiomarkers, TumorBreast neoplasmDiagnosticGene expression profilingPrognosticTherapy predictive

Identifiers

PMID29273958
PMCPMC5996012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.