Trial reportAIDS and behavior2018
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Case Management (Project Bridge) for HIV-Infected Probationers and Parolees.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized control trial of a combined community health worker and re-entry intervention for people with HIV recently released from jail who use substances.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2023Trial
- Effect of Case Management on HIV Outcomes for Community Corrections Population: Results of an 18-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2021Trial
- Contextual and culturally adapted interventions to improve HIV outcomes: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Lifetime HIV testing among three samples of adults with histories of incarceration in Southern California.AIDS care · 2024Article
- Understanding effective post-test linkage strategies for HIV prevention and care: a scoping review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Incarceration History and HIV Care Among Individuals Living with HIV in Florida, 2014-2018.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Approaches to Promoting Linkage to and Retention in HIV Care in the United States: a Scoping Review.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2021Article
- Harmonizing healthcare and other resource measures for evaluating economic costs in substance use disorder research.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2021Article
- Health Status and Health Care Utilization of US Adults Under Probation: 2015-2018.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Age-Standardized Mortality of Persons on Probation, in Jail, or in State Prison and the General Population, 2001-2012.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals on probation and parole are disproportionately at high risk for HIV infection and experience significant barriers to accessing health care. This study was a two-group randomized controlled trial conducted at a community corrections office and was designed to link HIV positive probationers/parolees to HIV treatment in the community. HIV positive participants were assigned to one of the two treatment conditions: (1) Project Bridge (PB), an intensive case-management intervention; or (2) treatment as usual (TAU), involving standard referral to treatment. We hypothesized that PB would be more effective than TAU in terms of initiating individuals in community HIV treatment. We found no difference in rates of, or time to, treatment initiation when comparing the PB to TAU (all ns > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between HIV medication regiment initiation by treatment condition (p > 0.05). Despite limitations, we found that probationers and parolees were willing to be screened and linked to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.