Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273857›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2018

Development of a dietary formulation of the SHetA2 chemoprevention drug for mice.

Doris M Benbrook, Naveena B Janakiram, Vishal Chandra, Gopal Pathuri, Venkateshwar Madka, Nicole C Stratton, Chioniso P Masamha, Cassadie N Farnsworth, Lucila Garcia-Contreras, Manolya Kukut Hatipoglu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. SHetA2 Attack on Mortalin and Colleagues in Cancer Therapy and Prevention.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Doris M BenbrookSection of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., BRC 1217A, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. Doris-Benbrook@ouhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7606-8245
Naveena B JanakiramCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Vishal ChandraSection of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., BRC 1217A, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Gopal PathuriCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Venkateshwar MadkaCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Nicole C StrattonCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Chioniso P MasamhaSection of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., BRC 1217A, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Cassadie N FarnsworthCameron University, 2800 W Gore Blvd, Lawton, OK, 73505, USA.
Lucila Garcia-ContrerasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1110 N. Stonewall, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117, USA.
Manolya Kukut HatipogluDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1110 N. Stonewall, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117, USA.
Stan LighfootCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Chinthalapally V RaoCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma City VA Medical Center · USButler University · USCameron University · US

Funding

Proteomics CoreP20GM103447 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Mark L Lang · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Wade Williams · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Ovarian Cancer ChemopreventionR01CA196200 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BENBROOK, DORIS MANGIARACINA · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Targeting HPV Consequences in a Cervical Cancer Clinical TrialR01CA200126 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BENBROOK, DORIS MANGIARACINA, MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2016 to 2021
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196200NCI NIH HHS R01CA196200NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200126NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103447NIH HHS 8P20GM103447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of cancer chemoprevention compounds requires enhanced consideration for toxicity and route of administration because the target population is healthy. The small molecule drug, SHetA2 (NSC 726189), exhibited in vivo chemoprevention activity and lack of toxicity when administered by oral gavage. Our objective was to determine if a dietary formulation of SHetA2 could achieve effective tissue drug levels without toxicity. C57bl/6 J mice were monitored on modified American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)76A diet mixed with SHetA2 in a 3:1 ratio with Kolliphor HS15, a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) to deliver 37.5, 62.5, 125, 187 or 250 mg SHetA2/kg/day. Blood and tissues were evaluated after 1, 3 and 6 weeks. The 187 mg/kg/day dose was identified as optimal based on achievement of maximum blood and tissue drug levels in the effective micromolar range without evidence of toxicity. The 250 mg/kg/day group exhibited lower drug levels and the highest intestinal drug content suggesting that an upper limit of intestinal absorption had been surpassed. Only this highest dose resulted in liver and kidney function tests that were outside of the normal range, and significant reduction of cyclin D1 protein in normal cervical tissue. SHetA2 reduced cyclin D1 to greater extents in cancer compared to non-cancer cell cultures. Given this differential effect, optimal chemoprevention without toxicity would be expected to occur at doses that reduced cyclin D1 in neoplastic, but not in normal tissues. These findings support further development of SHetA2 as a chemoprevention agent and potential food additive.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChemopreventionChromansDrug Delivery SystemsEmulsifying AgentsFemaleFood, FormulatedMiceMice, Inbred C57BLThiones(((4-nitrophenyl)amino)(2,2,4,4-tetramethyl thiochroman-6-yl)amino) methane-1-thioneAntineoplastic AgentsChromansEmulsifying AgentsThionesCyclin D1Dietary formulationIntestinal absorptionKolliphor HS15SHetA2Toxicity

Identifiers

PMID29273857
PMCPMC6014882
OpenAlexW2780290210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.