Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273854›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2018

Imidacloprid slows the development of preference for rewarding food sources in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Jordan D Phelps, Caroline G Strang, Malgorzata Gbylik-Sikorska, Tomasz Sniegocki, Andrzej Posyniak, David F Sherry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordan D PhelpsDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada. jphelps@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4710-9631
Caroline G StrangDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada.
Malgorzata Gbylik-SikorskaPharmacology and Toxicology Department, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), al. Partyzantow 57, 24-100, Pulawy, Poland.
Tomasz SniegockiPharmacology and Toxicology Department, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), al. Partyzantow 57, 24-100, Pulawy, Poland.
Andrzej PosyniakPharmacology and Toxicology Department, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), al. Partyzantow 57, 24-100, Pulawy, Poland.
David F SherryDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada.
National Veterinary Research Institute · PLWestern University · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 105542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee pollination is economically and ecologically vital and recent declines in bee populations are therefore a concern. One possible cause of bee declines is pesticide use. Bumblebees exposed to imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, have been shown to be less efficient foragers and collect less pollen on foraging trips than unexposed bees. We investigated whether bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) chronically exposed to imidacloprid at field-realistic levels of 2.6 and 10 ppb showed learning deficits that could affect foraging. Bumblebees were tested for their ability to associate flower colour with reward value in a simulated foraging environment. Bumblebees completed 10 foraging trips in which they collected sucrose solution from artificial flowers that varied in sucrose concentration. The reward quality of each artificial flower was predicted by corolla colour. Unexposed bumblebees acquired a preference for feeding on the most rewarding flower colour on the second foraging trip, while bumblebees exposed at 2.6 and 10 ppb did not until their third and fifth trip, respectively. The delay in preference acquisition in exposed bumblebees may be due to reduced flower sampling and shorter foraging trips. These results show that bumblebees exposed to imidacloprid are slow to learn the reward value of flowers and this may explain previously observed foraging inefficiencies associated with pesticide exposure.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsAnimalsBeesFeeding BehaviorFlowersImidazolesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPesticidesPollenPollinationimidaclopridImidazolesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPesticidesBumblebeeForagingImidaclopridLearningMemoryNeonicotinoid

Identifiers

PMID29273854
OpenAlexW2776906511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.