Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273826›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds in seven Latin American countries.

P Clark, E Denova-Gutiérrez, C Zerbini, A Sanchez, O Messina, J J Jaller, C Campusano, C H Orces, G Riera, H Johansson and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Comparison of country-specific FRAX models throughout Latin America: lessons from Costa Rica and Ecuador.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  4. Impact of a national reimbursement policy on anti-osteoporosis medication prescription at discharge after hip-fracture surgery in Japan: an interrupted time-series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Barriers and solutions for global access to osteoporosis management: a Position Paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical and demographic factors determining patient fracture risk decision point (FRDP): The improving risk communication in osteoporosis (RICO) project.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  9. A surrogate FRAX model for Nepal.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Performance of FRAX in older adults with frailty: the Framingham Heart Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

P ClarkClinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gomez, Dr. Márquez #164, Col. Doctores, Mexico City, Mexico.
E Denova-GutiérrezClinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gomez, Dr. Márquez #164, Col. Doctores, Mexico City, Mexico. edenovag@gmail.com.
C ZerbiniCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica, São Paulo, Brazil.
A SanchezCentro de Endocrinología, Rosario, Argentina.
O MessinaServicio de Reumatología, Hospital Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J J JallerCentro de Reumatología y Ortopedia, Barranquilla, Colombia.
C CampusanoClínica de la Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
C H OrcesDepartment of Medicine, Laredo Medical Center, Laredo, TX, USA.
G RieraUnidad Metabolica, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Venezuela.
H JohanssonInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
J A KanisInstitute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Argerich Hospital · ARAustralian Catholic University · AUCentro Científico Tecnólogico - Rosario · ARCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRFundacion Instituto de Reumatologia Fernando Chalem · COHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXLaredo Community College · USUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CLUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Carabobo · VEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-specific intervention and assessment thresholds were developed for seven Latin American countries. The intervention threshold ranged from 1.2% (Ecuador) to 27.5% (Argentina) at the age of 50 and 90 years, respectively. In the Latin American countries, FRAX offers a substantial advance for the detection of subjects at high fracture risk.

introductionIntervention thresholds are proposed using the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool. We recommended their use to calculate the ten-year probability of fragility fracture (FF) in both, men and women with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of this study is to compute FRAX-based intervention and BMD assessment thresholds for seven Latin American countries in men and women ≥ 40 years.

methodsThe intervention threshold (IT) was set at a 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) equivalent to a woman with a prior FF and a body mass index (BMI) equal to 25.0 kg/m

resultsFor the seven LA countries, the age-specific IT varied from 1.5 to 27.5% in Argentina, 3.8 to 25.2% in Brazil, 1.6 up to 20.0% in Chile, 0.6 to 10.2% in Colombia, 0.9 up to 13.6% in Ecuador, 2.6 to 20.0% in Mexico, and 0.7 up to 22.0% in Venezuela at the age of 40 and 90 years, respectively.

conclusionsIn the LA countries, FRAX-based IT offers a substantial advance for the detection of men and women at high fracture risk, particularly in the elderly. The heterogeneity of IT between the LA countries indicates that country-specific FRAX models are appropriate rather than a global LA model.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBody Mass IndexBone DensityFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAssessment thresholdsFRAXIntervention thresholdLatin American countriesOsteoporosisTen-year fracture probability

Identifiers

PMID29273826
OpenAlexW2777429574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.