Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273821›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2018

The abuse potential of kratom according the 8 factors of the controlled substances act: implications for regulation and research.

Jack E Henningfield, Reginald V Fant, Daniel W Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Kratom (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the drug interactions in kratom usage: clinical application.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Knowledge of Kratom among Alabama Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Kratom use as more than a "self-treatment".The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack E HenningfieldResearch, Health Policy and Abuse Liability, Pinney Associates, 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA. jhenning@pinneyassociates.com.
Reginald V FantResearch, Health Policy and Abuse Liability, Pinney Associates, 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Daniel W WangResearch, Health Policy and Abuse Liability, Pinney Associates, 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleConsideration by the US Drug Enforcement Administration and Food and Drug Administration of placing kratom into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) requires its evaluation of abuse potential in the context of public health.

objectiveThe objective of the study is to provide a review of kratom abuse potential and its evaluation according to the 8 factors of the CSA.

resultsKratom leaves and extracts have been used for centuries in Southeast Asia and elsewhere to manage pain and other disorders and, by mid-twentieth century, to manage opioid withdrawal. Kratom has some opioid effects but low respiratory depression and abuse potential compared to opioids of abuse. This appears due to its non-opioid-derived and resembling molecular structure recently referred to as biased agonists. By the early 2000s, kratom was increasingly used in the US as a natural remedy to improve mood and quality of life and as substitutes for prescription and illicit opioids for managing pain and opioid withdrawal by people seeking abstinence from opioids. There has been no documented threat to public health that would appear to warrant emergency scheduling of the products and placement in Schedule I of the CSA carries risks of creating serious public health problems.

conclusionsAlthough kratom appears to have pharmacological properties that support some level of scheduling, if it was an approved drug, placing it into Schedule I, thus banning it, risks creating public health problems that do not presently exist. Furthermore, appropriate regulation by FDA is vital to ensure appropriate and safe use.

Indexed as

MitragynaAnalgesics, OpioidBiomedical ResearchControlled SubstancesHumansPainQuality of LifeSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsSubstance-Related DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnalgesics, OpioidControlled SubstancesmitragynineSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsAbuse potentialAnalgesicControlled Substances ActDependenceDietary ingredientFood and Drug AdministrationKratomMitragynineOpioidWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID29273821
PMCPMC5813050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.