Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Integrated transcriptional analysis unveils the dynamics of cellular differentiation in the developing mouse hippocampus.

Giovanni Iacono, Marco Benevento, Aline Dubos, Yann Herault, Hans van Bokhoven, Nael Nadif Kasri, Hendrik G Stunnenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giovanni IaconoRadboud University, Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. giovanni.iacono@cnag.crg.eu.
Marco BeneventoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboudumc, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aline DubosInstitut Clinique de la Souris, Phenomin, Gie Cerbm, 1 rue Laurent Fries, 67404, Illkirch, France.
Yann HeraultInstitut Clinique de la Souris, Phenomin, Gie Cerbm, 1 rue Laurent Fries, 67404, Illkirch, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7049-6900
Hans van BokhovenDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboudumc, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nael Nadif KasriDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboudumc, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik G StunnenbergRadboud University, Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. H.Stunnenberg@ncmls.ru.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to assign expression patterns to the individual cell types that constitute a tissue is a major challenge. This especially applies to brain, given its plethora of different, functionally interconnected cell types. Here, we derived cell type-specific transcriptome signatures from existing single cell RNA data and integrated these signatures with a newly generated dataset of expression (bulk RNA-Seq) of the postnatal developing mouse hippocampus. This integrated analysis allowed us to provide a comprehensive and unbiased prediction of the differentiation drivers for 11 different hippocampal cell types and describe how the different cell types interact to support crucial developmental stages. Our results provide a reliable resource of predicted differentiation drivers and insights into the multifaceted aspects of the cells in hippocampus during development.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCell DifferentiationGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHippocampusMiceNeuronsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29273784
PMCPMC5741714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.