Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273773›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents and antibiotic prophylaxis for endophthalmitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Manuel F Bande, Raquel Mansilla, María P Pata, Maribel Fernández, María José Blanco-Teijeiro, Antonio Piñeiro, Francisco Gómez-Ulla

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Issues with Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Drugs.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel F BandeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. verman017@hotmail.com.
Raquel MansillaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María P PataBiostatech, Advice, Training and Innovation in Biostatistics, Edificio Emprendia, Campus Vida, s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maribel FernándezDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María José Blanco-TeijeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Antonio PiñeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Francisco Gómez-UllaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether the use of local antibiotics is a beneficial prophylactic treatment for endophthalmitis in patients treated with anti-VEGF agents. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane Library over the period January 2007 to December 2016. The search terms used included "Endophthalmitis", "Antibiotic" and "Intravitreal injection". Studies in which the patients were treated exclusively with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF were selected. Eight studies fit the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 276,774 injections; 109,178 (39.45%) were associated with the use of antibiotics and 114,821 (60.55%) were not associated with the use of antibiotics. Our meta-analysis indicated a significant risk for endophthalmitis that was 1.70 times greater with the use of antibiotics than that without antibiotics, with a confidence interval of 1.08 to 2.66 (p = 0.02). A meta-regression indicated that the location (operating rooms versus outpatient clinics) of injection did not have a significant effect on the incidence of endophthalmitis. The prophylactic use of antibiotics when administering anti-VEGF intravitreal injections may contribute to a greater incidence of endophthalmitis. This finding, in addition to reducing costs, would eliminate a treatment that has been shown to be unnecessary and even harmful to patients.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisEndophthalmitisHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID29273773
PMCPMC5741717
OpenAlexW2780254100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.