Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273738›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Generic wound signals initiate regeneration in missing-tissue contexts.

Suthira Owlarn, Felix Klenner, David Schmidt, Franziska Rabert, Antonio Tomasso, Hanna Reuter, Medhanie A Mulaw, Sören Moritz, Luca Gentile, Gilbert Weidinger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Suthira OwlarnMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-1415
Felix KlennerInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-1653
David SchmidtMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2005-4244
Franziska RabertMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Antonio TomassoMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-1969
Hanna ReuterMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Medhanie A MulawInstitute of Experimental Cancer Research, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Sören MoritzMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Luca GentileMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Gilbert WeidingerInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany. gilbert.weidinger@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3599-6760
Kerstin BartschererMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Von-Esmarch-Str. 54, 48149, Münster, Germany. kerstin.bartscherer@mpi-muenster.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-4389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the identification of numerous regulators of regeneration in different animal models, a fundamental question remains: why do some wounds trigger the full regeneration of lost body parts, whereas others resolve by mere healing? By selectively inhibiting regeneration initiation, but not the formation of a wound epidermis, here we create headless planarians and finless zebrafish. Strikingly, in both missing-tissue contexts, injuries that normally do not trigger regeneration activate complete restoration of heads and fin rays. Our results demonstrate that generic wound signals have regeneration-inducing power. However, they are interpreted as regeneration triggers only in a permissive tissue context: when body parts are missing, or when tissue-resident polarity signals, such as Wnt activity in planarians, are modified. Hence, the ability to decode generic wound-induced signals as regeneration-initiating cues may be the crucial difference that distinguishes animals that regenerate from those that cannot.

Indexed as

Animal FinsAnimalsHeadMAP Kinase Signaling SystemPlanariansRegenerationSignal TransductionWnt Signaling PathwayWound HealingWounds and InjuriesZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29273738
PMCPMC5741630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.