Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273653›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Perfusion index in healthy newborns during critical congenital heart disease screening at 24 hours: retrospective observational study from the USA.

Priya Jegatheesan, Matthew Nudelman, Keshav Goel, Dongli Song, Balaji Govindaswami

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priya JegatheesanDepartment of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California, USA.
Matthew NudelmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California, USA.
Keshav GoelDepartment of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California, USA.
Dongli SongDepartment of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California, USA.
Balaji GovindaswamiDepartment of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California, USA.
Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the distribution of perfusion index (PI) in asymptomatic newborns at 24 hours of life when screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using an automated data selection method.

designThis is a retrospective observational study.

settingNewborn nursery in a California public hospital with ~3500 deliveries annually.

methodsWe developed an automated programme to select the PI values from CCHD screens. Included were term and late preterm infants who were screened for CCHD from November 2013 to January 2014 and from May 2015 to July 2015. PI measurements were downloaded every 2 s from the pulse oximeter and median PI were calculated for each oxygen saturation screen in our cohort.

resultsWe included data from 2768 oxygen saturation screens. Each screen had a median of 29 data points (IQR 17 to 49). The median PI in our study cohort was 1.8 (95% CI 1.8 to 1.9) with IQR 1.2 to 2.7. The median preductal PI was significantly higher than the median postductal (1.9 vs 1.8, p=0.03) although this difference may not be clinically significant.

conclusionUsing an automated data selection method, the median PI in asymptomatic newborns at 24 hours of life is 1.8 with a narrow IQR of 1.2 to 2.7. This automated data selection method may improve accuracy and precision compared with manual data collection method. Further studies are needed to establish external validity of this automated data selection method and its clinical application for CCHD screening.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingCaliforniaFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHospitals, PublicHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningOximetryOxygen ConsumptionRetrospective Studiesasymptomatic newbornscritical congenital heart disease screeningnoninvasive monitoringoxygen saturation screeningperfusion index nomogramperfusion index screening

Identifiers

PMID29273653
PMCPMC5778276
OpenAlexW2780137683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.