Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273410›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2018

Atezolizumab in Platinum-treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Outcomes by Prior Number of Regimens.

Jose Luis Perez-Gracia, Yohann Loriot, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Thomas Powles, Andrea Necchi, Syed A Hussain, Rafael Morales-Barrera, Margitta M Retz, Günter Niegisch, Ignacio Durán and 7 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02108652 (A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02108652 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2014 to 2023Enrolled310ConditionsBladder CancerArmsAtezolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Detection of Molecular Signatures of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Bladder Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Identification of a Synthetic Lethal Relationship between Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficiency and Irofulven Sensitivity in Urothelial Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for urothelial carcinoma.Investigative and clinical urology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jose Luis Perez-GraciaClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: jlgracia@unav.es.
Yohann LoriotGustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département de Médecine, Villejuif, France.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Syed A HussainPlymouth University, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Devon, UK.
Rafael Morales-BarreraVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Margitta M RetzUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Günter NiegischDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ignacio DuránInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Christine ThéodoreDepartment of Oncology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Enrique GrandeHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Xiaodong ShenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jingjing WangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Betty NelsonGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christina L DerlethGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michiel S van der HeijdenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy have had few treatment options and uniformly poor outcomes. Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) was approved in the USA for cisplatin-ineligible and platinum-treated mUC based on IMvigor210, a phase 2, single-arm, two-cohort study.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab by the number of prior lines of systemic therapy in patients with pretreated mUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIMvigor210 enrolled 315 patients with mUC with progression during or following platinum-based therapy at 70 international sites between May 2014 and November 2014. Key inclusion criteria included age ≥18 yr, creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, with no limit on prior lines of treatment.

interventionPatients in this cohort received atezolizumab 1200mg intravenously every 3 wk until loss of clinical benefit. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Centrally assessed Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated by prior treatment. Potential differences between subgroups were evaluated using log-rank (for OS) and chi-square (for ORR and adverse events frequencies) testing. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three hundred and ten patients were efficacy and safety evaluable (median follow-up, 21 mo). Objective responses and prolonged OS occurred across all prespecified subgroups; median duration of response was not reached in most subgroups. In patients without prior systemic mUC therapy (first-line subgroup), ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval: 14-38), and median OS was 9.6 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.9-15.8). No significant differences in efficacy or toxicity by therapy line were observed.

conclusionsAtezolizumab demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in previously treated patients with mUC across all lines of therapy evaluated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated effects of previous treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma that progressed after platinum-based therapy. Atezolizumab was active and tolerable no matter how many treatment regimens patients had received. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02108652.

Indexed as

AtezolizumabImmunotherapyNumber of prior regimensPrevious platinum-based chemotherapyUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29273410
PMCPMC7448222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.