Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273076›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2017

Highly conformal combined radiotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine for treatment of loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer - a retrospective study.

Nikola Cihoric, Alexandros Tsikkinis, Eugenia Vlaskou Badra, Markus Glatzer, Urban Novak, Amina Scherz, Mohamed Shelan, Ivan Soldatovic, Chittazhathu Kurian Kuruvilla Yojena, Daniel M Aebersold and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikola CihoricDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. nikola.cihoric@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-8520
Alexandros TsikkinisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Eugenia Vlaskou BadraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Markus GlatzerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Urban NovakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Amina ScherzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mohamed ShelanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Ivan SoldatovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Chittazhathu Kurian Kuruvilla YojenaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Kristina LösslDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisplatin and gemcitabine combined with conventional radiation therapy in the treatment of cervical cancer patients results in a favorable outcome but with excess toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity profile of dual chemotherapy and highly conformal external beam radiotherapy with image guided adaptive brachytherapy.

methodsSeventeen patients with cervical carcinoma FIGO stage IB2-IIIB were treated with curative intent between 2011 and 2015. A total dose of 50.4 Gy was prescribed to the elective pelvic nodal volume. Patients with

resultsOne (6%) patient developed acute grade 3 diarrhea. We did not record any other acute or late gastrointestinal or urogenital toxicity higher that grade 3. Most common acute hematological toxicity was anemia grade 2 recorded in 10 (59%) patients. There was only one case of grade 3 neutropenia (6%). The number of patients that received the complete chemotherapy regimen was gradually declining during the course of therapy. From week 2 to 5, gemcitabine was omitted in 4 (24%),7 (41%), 8 (47%), and 12 (71%) patients respectively, similarly, cisplatin was omitted in 2 (12%),3 (18%),1 (6%) and 7 (41%) patients respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was omitted in 8 patients (47%). During a median follow-up time of 20 months (5 to 63 months) 6 (35%) patients developed disease relapse with 5 (29%) of them in the form of systemic disease.

conclusionsIn contrast to previous findings cisplatin and gemcitabine in combination with highly conformal radiation therapy seems to have an acceptable toxicity profile. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage of the proposed therapy concept.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansPrognosisRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineCervix cancerChemo-radiationCisplatinGemcitabineHighly conformal radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29273076
PMCPMC5741904
OpenAlexW2780250145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.