Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273070›Full record

ArticleTrials2017

The 'Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol' (ORBITAL) framework: protocol to determine a core outcome set for efficacy and effectiveness trials of alcohol screening and brief intervention.

G W Shorter, N Heather, Jeremy W Bray, E L Giles, A Holloway, C Barbosa, A H Berman, A J O'Donnell, M Clarke, K J Stockdale and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital Help for Substance Users (SU): A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Template for Rapid Iterative Consensus of Experts (TRICE).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

G W ShorterAlcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
N HeatherFaculty of Health and Life Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jeremy W BrayDepartment of Economics, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA. jwbray@uncg.edu.
E L GilesAlcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
A HollowaySchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
C BarbosaBehavioral Health Economics Program, RTI International, Chicago, IL, USA.
A H BermanCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
A J O'DonnellInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
M ClarkeNorthern Ireland Methodology Hub, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
K J StockdaleAlcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
D Newbury-BirchAlcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Teesside University · GBNewcastle University · GBNorthumbria University · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBRTI International · USStockholm Health Care Services · SEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · USYork St John University · GB

Funding

Alcohol Research UK R2016/04Medical Research Council G0901530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence base to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of alcohol brief interventions (ABI) is weakened by variation in the outcomes measured and by inconsistent reporting. The 'Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol' (ORBITAL) project aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) and reporting guidance for its use in future trials of ABI in a range of settings. METHODS/

designAn international Special Interest Group was convened through INEBRIA (International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drugs) to inform the development of a COS for trials of ABI. ORBITAL will incorporate a systematic review to map outcomes used in efficacy and effectiveness trials of ABI and their measurement properties, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. This will support a multi-round Delphi study to prioritise outcomes. Delphi panellists will be drawn from a range of settings and stakeholder groups, and the Delphi study will also be used to determine if a single COS is relevant for all settings. A consensus meeting with key stakeholder representation will determine the final COS and associated guidance for its use in trials of ABI. DISCUSSION: ORBITAL will develop a COS for alcohol screening and brief intervention trials, with outcomes stratified into domains and guidance on outcome measurement instruments. The standardisation of ABI outcomes and their measurement will support the ongoing development of ABI studies and a systematic synthesis of emerging research findings. We will track the extent to which the COS delivers on this promise through an exploration of the use of the guidance in the decade following COS publication.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignAlcoholismClinical ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHumansAlcoholAlcohol brief interventionBrief interventionConsensus methodsCore outcome setDelphi techniqueMeasurementOutcomes standardisationScreeningTrial

Identifiers

PMID29273070
PMCPMC5741954
OpenAlexW2774468843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.