Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273055›Full record

ReviewArthritis research & therapy2017

Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: clinical and therapeutic relevance.

Nilasha Ghosh, Eric M Ruderman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of ixekizumab in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Content validity of the ASQoL for use in a non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis population: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nilasha GhoshNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 North St. Clair, Suite 14-100, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Eric M RudermanNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 North St. Clair, Suite 14-100, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. e-ruderman@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) provide for the inclusion of patients with a wide range of presentations and manifestations. While not considered a formal subclassification, patients are often divided into radiographic or nonradiographic axSpA based on the presence or absence of radiographic sacroiliitis. This review will focus on nonradiographic axSpA and will discuss clinical manifestations of disease that distinguish, or in many cases do not distinguish, this entity from other individuals with axSpA. This review will also cover treatment paradigms for nonradiographic axSpA, particularly the use of biologic therapies, where current data suggest that nonradiographic disease should be managed largely the same as radiographic disease, or classical ankylosing spondylitis.

Indexed as

HumansSpondylitis, AnkylosingAxial spondyloarthritisBiologic therapyDisease classificationNonradiographic axial spondyloarthritisTherapy

Identifiers

PMID29273055
PMCPMC5741895
OpenAlexW2778130919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.