Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29273008›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Implementation of guidelines for multidisciplinary team management of pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes or cardiac conditions: results from a UK national survey.

Cath Taylor, David R McCance, Lucy Chappell, Catherine Nelson-Piercy, Sara A Thorne, Khaled M K Ismail, James S A Green, Debra Bick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Creating a Multidisciplinary Pregnancy Heart Team.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cath TaylorUniversity of Surrey, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK. Cath.Taylor@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-4744
David R McCanceRegional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Lucy ChappellKing's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre, Division of Women's Health, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Catherine Nelson-PiercyKing's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre, Division of Women's Health, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Sara A ThorneDepartment of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Khaled M K IsmailThe Birmingham Centre of Women's and Children's Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
James S A GreenWhipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Debra BickKing's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
King's College London · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

BartsHealth NHS Trust n/aDepartment of Health RP-2014-05-019King's College London n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite numerous publications stating the importance of multidisciplinary care for women with pre-existing medical conditions, there is a lack of evidence regarding structure or processes of multidisciplinary working, nor impact on maternal or infant outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of guidelines for multidisciplinary team (MDT) management in pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes or cardiac conditions. These conditions were selected as exemplars of increasingly common medical conditions in pregnancy for which MDT management is recommended to prevent or reduce adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

methodsNational on-line survey sent to clinicians responsible for management or referral of women with pre-existing diabetes or cardiac conditions in UK National Health Service (NHS) maternity units. The survey comprised questions regarding the organisation of MDT management for women with pre-existing diabetes or cardiac conditions. Content was informed by national guidance.

resultsOne hundred seventy-nine responses were received, covering all health regions in England (162 responses) and 17 responses from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. 132 (74%) related to women with diabetes and 123 (69%) to women with cardiac conditions. MDT referral was reportedly standard practice in most hospitals, particularly for women with pre-existing diabetes (88% of responses vs. 63% for cardiac) but there was wide variation in relation to MDT membership, timing of referral and working practices. These inconsistencies were evident within and between maternity units across the UK. Reported membership was medically dominated and often in the absence of midwifery/nursing and other allied health professionals. Less than half of MDTs for women with diabetes met the recommendations for membership in national guidance, and although two thirds of MDTs for women with cardiac disease met the core recommendations for membership, most did not report having the extended members: midwives, neonatologists or intensivists.

conclusionsThe wide diversity of organisational management for women with pre-existing diabetes or cardiac conditions is of concern and merits more detailed inquiry. Evidence is also required to support and better define the recommendations for MDT care.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Plan ImplementationHumansPatient Care TeamPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareUnited KingdomYoung AdultCardiac conditionsDiabetesMultidisciplinary carePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29273008
PMCPMC5741950
OpenAlexW2780770231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.