Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29272536›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018

Complex Relationships between Chromatin Accessibility, Sequence Divergence, and Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Cristina M Alexandre, James R Urton, Ken Jean-Baptiste, John Huddleston, Michael W Dorrity, Josh T Cuperus, Alessandra M Sullivan, Felix Bemm, Dino Jolic, Andrej A Arsovski and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of DNA content in shaping chromatin architecture and gene expression.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CScience advances · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Genome accessibility dynamics in response to phosphate limitation is controlled by the PHR1 family of transcription factors inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cristina M AlexandreDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
James R UrtonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ken Jean-BaptisteDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
John HuddlestonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Michael W DorrityDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Josh T CuperusDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Alessandra M SullivanAltius Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Seattle, WA.
Felix BemmDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Dino JolicDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Andrej A ArsovskiDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Agnieszka ThompsonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jennifer L NemhauserDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Stan FieldsDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Kerry L BubbDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Christin QueitschDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

University of Washington PhD Training in Big Data for Genomics and NeuroscienceT32CA206089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL, THOMAS L., FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L · 2015 to 2015
$286k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS T32 CA206089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in regulatory DNA is thought to drive phenotypic variation, evolution, and disease. Prior studies of regulatory DNA and transcription factors across animal species highlighted a fundamental conundrum: Transcription factor binding domains and cognate binding sites are conserved, while regulatory DNA sequences are not. It remains unclear how conserved transcription factors and dynamic regulatory sites produce conserved expression patterns across species. Here, we explore regulatory DNA variation and its functional consequences within Arabidopsis thaliana, using chromatin accessibility to delineate regulatory DNA genome-wide. Unlike in previous cross-species comparisons, the positional homology of regulatory DNA is maintained among A. thaliana ecotypes and less nucleotide divergence has occurred. Of the ∼50,000 regulatory sites in A. thaliana, we found that 15% varied in accessibility among ecotypes. Some of these accessibility differences were associated with extensive, previously unannotated sequence variation, encompassing many deletions and ancient hypervariable alleles. Unexpectedly, for the majority of such regulatory sites, nearby gene expression was unaffected. Nevertheless, regulatory sites with high levels of sequence variation and differential chromatin accessibility were the most likely to be associated with differential gene expression. Finally, and most surprising, we found that the vast majority of differentially accessible sites show no underlying sequence variation. We argue that these surprising results highlight the necessity to consider higher-order regulatory context in evaluating regulatory variation and predicting its phenotypic consequences.

Indexed as

EcotypeRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalArabidopsisBase SequenceDeoxyribonuclease IGenomic Structural VariationSequence Analysis, DNADeoxyribonuclease I

Identifiers

PMID29272536
PMCPMC5889003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.