Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29272327›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2019

Developing a 'personalome' for precision medicine: emerging methods that compute interpretable effect sizes from single-subject transcriptomes.

Francesca Vitali, Qike Li, A Grant Schissler, Joanne Berghout, Colleen Kenost, Yves A Lussier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. How CD4Biomedicines · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knowledge Generation with Rule Induction in Cancer Omics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca VitaliBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Qike LiBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
A Grant SchisslerUniversity of Nevada, Reno.
Joanne BerghoutBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Colleen KenostBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Yves A LussierBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Structure-Function Analysis of nmMLCK in EC Barrier ResponsesP01HL126609 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Joe G. N. Garcia · 2016 to 2026
$24.4M
Early Origins of Chronic Lung Disease: Outcomes into the Fifth Decade of LifeR01HL132523 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Stefano Guerra, Fernando D Martinez · 2016 to 2026
$15.1M
University of Arizona - Banner Health Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Enrollment CenterUG3OD023171 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MENON, USHA, OJO, AKINLOLU OLUSEUN · 2016 to 2017
$8.8M
Immuno-Genetic Basis for Human Disseminated CoccidioidomycosisU01AI122275 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GALGIANI, JOHN N, HOLLAND, STEVEN M · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
A New Treatment Paradigm for ALK-Driven Cancers Exploiting Oncogene OverdoseR01CA190696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SCHATZ, JONATHAN H · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Phenomic and genomic study to subphenotype Hispanics with pulmonary hypertensionU01HL125208 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GARCIA, JOE G. N., RISCHARD, FRANZ P · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190696NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL126609NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132523NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL125208NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI122275NIH HHS UG3 OD023171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of computational methods capable of analyzing -omics data at the individual level is critical for the success of precision medicine. Although unprecedented opportunities now exist to gather data on an individual's -omics profile ('personalome'), interpreting and extracting meaningful information from single-subject -omics remain underdeveloped, particularly for quantitative non-sequence measurements, including complete transcriptome or proteome expression and metabolite abundance. Conventional bioinformatics approaches have largely been designed for making population-level inferences about 'average' disease processes; thus, they may not adequately capture and describe individual variability. Novel approaches intended to exploit a variety of -omics data are required for identifying individualized signals for meaningful interpretation. In this review-intended for biomedical researchers, computational biologists and bioinformaticians-we survey emerging computational and translational informatics methods capable of constructing a single subject's 'personalome' for predicting clinical outcomes or therapeutic responses, with an emphasis on methods that provide interpretable readouts. Key points: (i) the single-subject analytics of the transcriptome shows the greatest development to date and, (ii) the methods were all validated in simulations, cross-validations or independent retrospective data sets. This survey uncovers a growing field that offers numerous opportunities for the development of novel validation methods and opens the door for future studies focusing on the interpretation of comprehensive 'personalomes' through the integration of multiple -omics, providing valuable insights into individual patient outcomes and treatments.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineTranscriptomeHumansn-of-1personalomeprecision medicinesingle-subject studies

Identifiers

PMID29272327
PMCPMC6585155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.