Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29272312›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Patients' perceptions of service quality in China: An investigation using the SERVQUAL model.

Li-Hua Fan, Lei Gao, Xin Liu, Shi-Hong Zhao, Hui-Tong Mu, Zhe Li, Lei Shi, Ling-Ling Wang, Xiao-Li Jia, Min Ha and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931809 (Evaluation of the Perception of Quality of Care of Patients Admitted to a Medical-Surgical ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931809 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Perception of Quality of Care of Patients Admitted to a Medical-Surgical ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Sao DomingosRan2023 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsCritically IllArmsSerqual tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Li-Hua FanDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Lei GaoDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Hong ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Hui-Tong MuDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhe LiDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Lei ShiDepartment of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Ling-Ling WangDepartment of Autonomous Protection, Chinese Hospital Association, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Li JiaDepartment of Autonomous Protection, Chinese Hospital Association, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Min HaDepartment of Autonomous Protection, Chinese Hospital Association, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Feng-Ge LouDepartment of Public Health Research, School of Public Health, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe doctor-patient relationship has been a major focus of society. Hospitals' efforts to improve the quality of their medical services have been to reduce the probability of doctor-patient conflicts. In this study, we aimed to determine the gap between expectations and perceptions of service quality according to patients to provide reference data for creating strategies to improve health care quality.

methodsTwenty-seven hospitals in 15 provinces (municipalities directly beneath the central government) were selected for our survey; we sent out 1,589 questionnaires, of which 1,520 were collected (response rate 95.65%) and 1,303 were valid (85.72% effective recovery rate). Paired t-tests were used to analyze whether there were significant differences between patients' expectations and perceived service quality. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether there were significant differences in the gap between expectation and perception of service quality according to patients' demographic characteristics.

resultsThere was a significant difference between the expected and perceived service quality (p < 0.05) according to patients both before and after receiving medical services. Furthermore, the service quality gap of each service dimension was negative. Specifically, the gaps in service quality were as follows: economy, responsiveness, empathy, assurance, reliability, and tangibles. Overall, we can conclude that patients' perceptions of service quality are lower than their expectations.

conclusionsAccording to the study results, the quality of health care services as perceived by patients was lower than expected. Hospitals should make adjustments according to the actual situation and should strive to constantly improve the quality of medical services for patients.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29272312
PMCPMC5741236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.