Trial reportPloS one2017
Handwriting training in Parkinson's disease: A trade-off between size, speed and fluency.
Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Neural and motor mechanisms of handwriting: from healthy aging to neurodegenerative disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Handwriting, touchscreen dexterity and bradykinesia measures in Parkinson's disease: a feature selection study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Intelligent Human-Computer Interaction: Combined Wrist and Forearm Myoelectric Signals for Handwriting Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intensive training programme improves handwriting in a community cohort of people with Parkinson's disease.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Rehabilitative interventions for impaired handwriting in people with Parkinson's disease: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Smoothness of movement in idiopathic cervical dystonia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- New Recovery Strategies in Motor and Cognitive Functions, before, during and after Home-Confinement COVID-19, for Healthy Adults and Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases: Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Functional Recovery in Parkinson's Disease: Current State and Future Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Levodopa improves handwriting and instrumental tasks in previously treated patients with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020Article
- The nature of bradykinesia in schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics.Psychiatry research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn previous work, we found that intensive amplitude training successfully improved micrographia in Parkinson's disease (PD). Handwriting abnormalities in PD also express themselves in stroke duration and writing fluency. It is currently unknown whether training changes these dysgraphic features.
objectiveTo determine the differential effects of amplitude training on various hallmarks of handwriting abnormalities in PD.
methodsWe randomized 38 right-handed subjects in early to mid-stage of PD into an experimental group (n = 18), receiving training focused at improving writing size during 30 minutes/day, five days/week for six weeks, and a placebo group (n = 20), receiving stretch and relaxation exercises at equal intensity. Writing skills were assessed using a touch-sensitive tablet pre- and post-training, and after a six-week retention period. Tests encompassed a transfer task, evaluating trained and untrained sequences, and an automatization task, comparing single- and dual-task handwriting. Outcome parameters were stroke duration (s), writing velocity (cm/s) and normalized jerk (i.e. fluency).
resultsIn contrast to the reported positive effects of training on writing size, the current results showed increases in stroke duration and normalized jerk after amplitude training, which were absent in the placebo group. These increases remained after the six-week retention period. In contrast, velocity remained unchanged throughout the study.
conclusionWhile intensive amplitude training is beneficial to improve writing size in PD, it comes at a cost as fluency and stroke duration deteriorated after training. The findings imply that PD patients can redistribute movement priorities after training within a compromised motor system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.