Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29272301›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Handwriting training in Parkinson's disease: A trade-off between size, speed and fluency.

Evelien Nackaerts, Sanne Broeder, Marcelo P Pereira, Stephan P Swinnen, Wim Vandenberghe, Alice Nieuwboer, Elke Heremans

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rehabilitative interventions for impaired handwriting in people with Parkinson's disease: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelien NackaertsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-4902
Sanne BroederDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marcelo P PereiraDepartment of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stephan P SwinnenDepartment of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wim VandenbergheDepartment of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alice NieuwboerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elke HeremansDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn previous work, we found that intensive amplitude training successfully improved micrographia in Parkinson's disease (PD). Handwriting abnormalities in PD also express themselves in stroke duration and writing fluency. It is currently unknown whether training changes these dysgraphic features.

objectiveTo determine the differential effects of amplitude training on various hallmarks of handwriting abnormalities in PD.

methodsWe randomized 38 right-handed subjects in early to mid-stage of PD into an experimental group (n = 18), receiving training focused at improving writing size during 30 minutes/day, five days/week for six weeks, and a placebo group (n = 20), receiving stretch and relaxation exercises at equal intensity. Writing skills were assessed using a touch-sensitive tablet pre- and post-training, and after a six-week retention period. Tests encompassed a transfer task, evaluating trained and untrained sequences, and an automatization task, comparing single- and dual-task handwriting. Outcome parameters were stroke duration (s), writing velocity (cm/s) and normalized jerk (i.e. fluency).

resultsIn contrast to the reported positive effects of training on writing size, the current results showed increases in stroke duration and normalized jerk after amplitude training, which were absent in the placebo group. These increases remained after the six-week retention period. In contrast, velocity remained unchanged throughout the study.

conclusionWhile intensive amplitude training is beneficial to improve writing size in PD, it comes at a cost as fluency and stroke duration deteriorated after training. The findings imply that PD patients can redistribute movement priorities after training within a compromised motor system.

Indexed as

HandwritingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseasePlacebosPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID29272301
PMCPMC5741263
OpenAlexW2777736689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.