Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29272268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Retention in care among HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women on lifelong antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: A retrospective cohort study.

Simon Muhumuza, Evelyn Akello, Charity Kyomugisha-Nuwagaba, Rose Baryamutuma, Isaac Sebuliba, Ibrahim M Lutalo, Edgar Kansiime, Linda N Kisaakye, Agnes N Kiragga, Rachel King and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon MuhumuzaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-7355-9791
Evelyn AkelloSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Charity Kyomugisha-NuwagabaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rose BaryamutumaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaac SebulibaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ibrahim M LutaloSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Edgar KansiimeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Linda N KisaakyeAIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes N KiraggaInfectious Disease Institute, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rachel KingGlobal Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
William BazeyoSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Christina LindanGlobal Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, Uganda updated its prevention of maternal-to-child transmission of HIV program to Option B+, which requires that all HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women be started on lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) regardless of CD4 count. We describe retention in care and factors associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU) among women initiated on Option B+ as part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of the national program.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of data abstracted from records of 2,169 women enrolled on Option B+ between January and March 2013 from a representative sample of 145 health facilities in all 24 districts of the Central region of Uganda. We defined retention as "being alive and receiving ART at the last clinic visit". We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate retention in care and compared differences between women retained in care and those LTFU using the chi-squared test for dichotomized or categorical variables.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 20.2 months (IQR 4.2-22.5). The proportion of women retained in HIV care at 6, 12 and 18 months post-ART initiation was 74.2%, 66.7% and 62.0%, respectively. Retention at 18 months varied significantly by level of health facility and ranged from 70.0% among those seen at hospitals to 56.6% among those seen at lower level health facilities. LTFU was higher among women aged less than 25 years, 59.3% compared to those aged 25 years and above, 40.7% (p = 0.02); among those attending care at lower level facilities, 44.0% compared to those attending care at hospitals, 34.1% (p = 0.01), and among those who were not tested for CD4 cell count at ART initiation, 69.4% compared to those who were tested, 30.9% (p = 0.002).

conclusionRetention of women who were initiated on Option B+ during the early phases of roll-out was only moderate, and could undermine the effectiveness of the program. Identifying reasons why women drop out and designing targeted interventions for improved retention should be a priority.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUgandaAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29272268
PMCPMC5741223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.