ReviewAnnual review of public health2018
Data Resources for Conducting Health Services and Policy Research.
Review in Annual review of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health-Related Data Sources Accessible to Health Researchers From the US Government: Mapping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Demographic disparities, temporal trends, and geographic patterns of HPV vaccination on Long Island, New York: A comprehensive analysis of immunization registry data (2012-2023).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Comparing pregnancy and pregnancy outcome rates between adolescents with and without pre-existing mental disorders.PloS one · 2024Article
- Red-flag signs and symptoms for earlier diagnosis of early-onset colorectal cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Overview of the 2019 National Health Interview Survey Questionnaire Redesign.American journal of public health · 2023Article
- De-identified data quality assessment approaches by data vendors who license data to healthcare and life sciences researchers.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- Data resources for evaluating the economic and financial consequences of surgical care in the United States.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2022Review
- Risks and Opportunities to Ensure Equity in the Application of Big Data Research in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2022Review
- Assessment for residual disease after pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Real-World Assessment of Interferon-β-1b and Interferon-β-1a Adherence Before and After the Introduction of the BETACONNECTDrugs - real world outcomes · 2021Article
- The Intersection of Rural Residence and Minority Race/Ethnicity in Cancer Disparities in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular and Bleeding Outcomes with Anticoagulants across Kidney Disease Stages: Analysis of a National US Cohort.American journal of nephrology · 2021Observational
- Article
- Variability in influenza vaccination opportunities and coverage among privately insured children.Vaccine · 2020Article
- Life in Data Sets: Locating and Accessing Data on the Health of Americans Across the Life Span.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rich federal data resources provide essential data inputs for monitoring the health and health care of the US population and are essential for conducting health services policy research. The six household surveys we document in this article cover a broad array of health topics, including health insurance coverage (American Community Survey, Current Population Survey), health conditions and behaviors (National Health Interview Survey, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System), health care utilization and spending (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey), and longitudinal data on public program participation (SIPP). New federal activities are linking federal surveys with administrative data to reduce duplication and response burden. In the private sector, vendors are aggregating data from medical records and claims to enhance our understanding of treatment, quality, and outcomes of medical care. Federal agencies must continue to innovate to meet the continuous challenges of scarce resources, pressures for more granular data, and new multimode data collection methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.