ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2017
3D Powder Printed Bioglass and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Scaffolds.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication and characterizations of 3D printed GelMA-Gel/bioactive glass scaffolds containing cerium for bone damage repair.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Core-shell 3D printed biodegradable calcium phosphate cement-Alginate scaffolds for possible bone regeneration applications.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2024Article
- Unraveling the potential of 3D bioprinted immunomodulatory materials for regulating macrophage polarization: State-of-the-art in bone and associated tissue regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- β-TCP/S53P4 Scaffolds Obtained by Gel Casting: Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Adjustment of Micro- and Macroporosity of ß-TCP Scaffolds Using Solid-Stabilized Foams as Bone Replacement.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Alternative Geometries for 3D Bioprinting of Calcium Phosphate Cement as Bone Substitute.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The Design of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid-Bioglass Composite Scaffold: A Potential Implant Material for Bone Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Treatments for Osteoporosis-Which Combination of Pills Is the Best among the Bad?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Rat Calvarial Bone Regeneration by 3D-Printed β-Tricalcium Phosphate Incorporating MicroRNA-200c.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- Improved cytocompatibility and antibacterial properties of zinc-substituted brushite bone cement based on β-tricalcium phosphate.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Surface Modified β-Tricalcium phosphate enhanced stem cell osteogenic differentiation in vitro and bone regeneration in vivo.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Inverse 3D Printing with Variations of the Strand Width of the Resulting Scaffolds for Bone Replacement.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Influence of random and designed porosities on 3D printed tricalcium phosphate-bioactive glass scaffolds.Additive manufacturing · 2021Article
- Mechanical Properties of the Composite Material consisting of β-TCP and Alginate-Di-Aldehyde-Gelatin Hydrogel and Its Degradation Behavior.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Additive Manufacturing of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Components via Fused Deposition of Ceramics (FDC).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Exploring Macroporosity of Additively Manufactured Titanium Metamaterials for Bone Regeneration with Quality by Design: A Systematic Literature Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds.Bioactive materials · 2020Review
- Bone Regeneration, Reconstruction and Use of Osteogenic Cells; from Basic Knowledge, Animal Models to Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Poly(Dopamine) Coating on 3D-Printed Poly-Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of both bioglass (BG) and β tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for bone replacement applications has been studied extensively due to the materials' high biocompatibility and ability to resorb when implanted in the body. 3D printing has been explored as a fast and versatile technique for the fabrication of porous bone scaffolds. This project investigates the effects of using different combinations of a composite BG and β-TCP powder for 3D printing of porous bone scaffolds. Porous 3D powder printed bone scaffolds of BG, β-TCP, 50/50 BG/β-TCP and 70/30 BG/β-TCP compositions were subject to a variety of characterization and biocompatibility tests. The porosity characteristics, surface roughness, mechanical strength, viability for cell proliferation, material cytotoxicity and in vitro bioactivity were assessed. The results show that the scaffolds can support osteoblast-like MG-63 cells growth both on the surface of and within the scaffold material and do not show alarming cytotoxicity; the porosity and surface characteristics of the scaffolds are appropriate. Of the two tested composite materials, the 70/30 BG/β-TCP scaffold proved to be superior in terms of biocompatibility and mechanical strength. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds makes them unsuitable for load bearing applications. However, they can be useful for other applications such as bone fillers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.