Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29271831›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.

David B Pisoni, Arthur Broadstock, Taylor Wucinich, Natalie Safdar, Kelly Miller, Luis R Hernandez, Kara Vasil, Lauren Boyce, Alexandra Davies, Michael S Harris and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comprehension of Morse Code Predicted by Item Recall From Short-Term Memory.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Explaining Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Complementary Contributions of Demographic, Sensory, and Cognitive Factors.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David B PisoniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Arthur BroadstockDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Taylor WucinichDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Natalie SafdarDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kelly MillerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Luis R HernandezDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Kara VasilDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lauren BoyceDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alexandra DaviesDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michael S HarrisDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Irina CastellanosDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Huiping XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
William G KronenbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Aaron C MoberlyDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
SPEECH PERCEPTION &SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITIONR01DC000111 · NIDCD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PISONI, DAVID B · 1989 to 2015
$8.1M
Executive Functioning and Speech-Language Skills in Cochlear Implant UsersR01DC015257 · NIDCD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KRONENBERGER, WILLIAM G, PISONI, DAVID B · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
Neurocognitive Processes in Deaf Children with Cochlear ImplantsR01DC009581 · NIDCD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI PISONI, DAVID B · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
Variability in Speech Recognition for Adults with Cochlear Implants: Bottom-up and Top-down FactorsK23DC015539 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOBERLY, AARON C · 2017 to 2021
$934k
VESTIBULO-OLIVARY FUNCTIONF32DC000111 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI KAUFMAN, GALEN D · 1994 to 1996
–
SHORT TERM ADAPTATION OF THE VESTIBULO/OCULAR REFLEXK08DC000111 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KRAMER, PHILLIP D · 1995 to 1998
–
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000111NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC000111NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC015539NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000111NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009581NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite the importance of verbal learning and memory in speech and language processing, this domain of cognitive functioning has been virtually ignored in clinical studies of hearing loss and cochlear implants in both adults and children. In this article, we report the results of two studies that used a newly developed visually based version of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II), a well-known normed neuropsychological measure of verbal learning and memory.

designThe first study established the validity and feasibility of a computer-controlled visual version of the CVLT-II, which eliminates the effects of audibility of spoken stimuli, in groups of young normal-hearing and older normal-hearing (ONH) adults. A second study was then carried out using the visual CVLT-II format with a group of older postlingually deaf experienced cochlear implant (ECI) users (N = 25) and a group of ONH controls (N = 25) who were matched to ECI users for age, socioeconomic status, and nonverbal IQ. In addition to the visual CVLT-II, subjects provided data on demographics, hearing history, nonverbal IQ, reading fluency, vocabulary, and short-term memory span for visually presented digits. ECI participants were also tested for speech recognition in quiet.

resultsThe ECI and ONH groups did not differ on most measures of verbal learning and memory obtained with the visual CVLT-II, but deficits were identified in ECI participants that were related to recency recall, the buildup of proactive interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting. Within the ECI group, nonverbal fluid IQ, reading fluency, and resistance to the buildup of proactive interference from the CVLT-II consistently predicted better speech recognition outcomes.

conclusionsResults from this study suggest that several underlying foundational neurocognitive abilities are related to core speech perception outcomes after implantation in older adults. Implications of these findings for explaining individual differences and variability and predicting speech recognition outcomes after implantation are discussed.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationMemoryVerbal LearningAdolescentAdultCognitionDeafnessFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReading

Identifiers

PMID29271831
PMCPMC6013309
OpenAlexW2778186254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.