ArticleEye (London, England)2018
Matrix regeneration agents improve wound healing in non-stressed human corneal epithelial cells.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Molecular profiling and functional analyses of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for dry eye diseases.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Development of In Vitro Dry Eye Models to Study Proliferative and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Allogeneic Serum Eye Drops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Case Reports for Topical Treatment of Corneal Ulcers with a New Matrix Therapy Agent or RGTAVeterinary sciences · 2019Article
- Corneal Repair and Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeMatrix regenerating agents (RGTAs) emerged as promising in vivo wound-healing agents. These agents could prove beneficial for the treatment of dry eye disease-associated corneal micro-erosions; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the wound healing efficacy of regenerative agents (RGTAs or serum) in an in vitro model of hyperosmolarity (HO) stressed and non-stressed human corneal epithelial cells.Patients and methodsThe migration and proliferation induced by the regenerative agents was evaluated using an in vitro scratch wound assay and brome-deoxy-uridine incorporation. The inflammatory profile and effects of osmoregulators were also investigated. The two-tailed paired t-test calculated the statistical significance, with P-value<0.05 considered significant.ResultsThe most efficient inducer of re-epithelization was 2% serum, followed closely by 2% RGTA with an average improvement in cell migration of 1.8- and 1.4-fold, respectively, when compared with the non-treated control. Hyperosmolar stress significantly reduced the restorative effects of both serum and RGTAs; these effects were, however, neutralized by the osmoregulator betaine.ConclusionThese findings suggest that RGTAs could provide efficient treatment for dry-eye associated corneal micro-lesions if ocular surface HO is neutralized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.