Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29271233›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2018

Scott P Campbell, Antonios Tzortzakakis, Mehrbod S Javadi, Mattias Karlsson, Lilja B Solnes, Rimma Axelsson, Mohamad E Allaf, Michael A Gorin, Steven P Rowe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SNMMI/EANM/ACNM Procedure Standard/Procedure Guideline on the Use of Molecular Imaging for Renal Mass Characterization.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Imaging of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma withMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The value ofCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  10. Evaluation of an incidental solid renal mass during cardiac Tc-99m MIBI SPECT/CT imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The impact of sestamibi scan on clinical decision-making for renal masses: An observational single-center study.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott P Campbell1 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Antonios Tzortzakakis2 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Imaging and Function, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Mehrbod S Javadi3 The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Mattias Karlsson4 Imaging and Function, Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden.
Lilja B Solnes3 The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Rimma Axelsson5 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Imaging and Function, Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Mohamad E Allaf1 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Michael A Gorin1 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Steven P Rowe1 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In parallel to the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging, the incidence of small renal masses has steadily risen in recent years. At the present time, anatomical imaging techniques are limited in their ability to differentiate benign from malignant renal masses. Moreover, renal mass biopsy has a high non-diagnostic rate, poor negative-predictive ability, and carries potential risks as well as substantial costs. As a result, benign renal masses are often unnecessarily resected for the false presumption of cancer.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansKidney NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

PMID29271233
PMCPMC5966009
OpenAlexW2777175843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.