Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29271092›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2018

Genetic testing including targeted gene panel in a diverse clinical population of children with autism spectrum disorder: Findings and implications.

Louisa Kalsner, Jennifer Twachtman-Bassett, Kristin Tokarski, Christine Stanley, Thyde Dumont-Mathieu, Justin Cotney, Stormy Chamberlain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review of autism spectrum disorder databases for the identification of candidate genes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa KalsnerConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-2013
Jennifer Twachtman-BassettConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kristin TokarskiUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Christine StanleyCourtagen Life Sciences, Woburn, MA, USA.
Thyde Dumont-MathieuConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Justin CotneyUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Stormy ChamberlainUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
University of Connecticut · USConnecticut Children's Medical Center · USCourtagen Life Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

Unraveling mechanisms of genome regulation to understand and improvehuman healthR35GM119465 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI COTNEY, JUSTIN LEE · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is now standard in the clinical setting, with American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMGG) guidelines recommending microarray for all children, fragile X testing for boys and additional gene sequencing, including PTEN and MECP2, in appropriate patients. Increasingly, testing utilizing high throughput sequencing, including gene panels and whole exome sequencing, are offered as well.

methodsWe performed genetic testing including microarray, fragile X testing and targeted gene panel, consistently sequencing 161 genes associated with ASD risk, in a clinical population of 100 well characterized children with ASD. Frequency of rare variants identified in individual genes was compared with that reported in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database.

resultsWe did not diagnose any conditions with complete penetrance for ASD; however, copy number variants believed to contribute to ASD risk were identified in 12%. Eleven children were found to have likely pathogenic variants on gene panel, yet, after careful analysis, none was considered likely causative of disease. KIRREL3 variants were identified in 6.7% of children compared to 2% in ExAC, suggesting a potential role for KIRREL3 variants in ASD risk. Children with KIRREL3 variants more often had minor facial dysmorphism and intellectual disability. We also observed an increase in rare variants in TSC2. However, analysis of variant data from the Simons Simplex Collection indicated that rare variants in TSC2 occur more commonly in specific racial/ethnic groups, which are more prevalent in our population than in the ExAC database.

conclusionThe yield of genetic testing including microarray, fragile X (boys) and targeted gene panel was 12%. Gene panel did not increase diagnostic yield; however, we found an increase in rare variants in KIRREL3. Our findings reinforce the need for racial/ethnic diversity in large-scale genomic databases used to identify variants that contribute to disease risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentAutism Spectrum DisorderCarrier ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolDNA Copy Number VariationsEthnicityExomeFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantCarrier ProteinsKIRREL3 protein, humanMembrane Proteinsautism spectrum disorderKIRREL3microarrayracial/ethnic diversitytargeted gene panelTSC2

Identifiers

PMID29271092
PMCPMC5902398
OpenAlexW2778554631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.