Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29271053›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Networks of myelin covariance.

Lester Melie-Garcia, David Slater, Anne Ruef, Gretel Sanabria-Diaz, Martin Preisig, Ferath Kherif, Bogdan Draganski, Antoine Lutti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Networks of myelin covariance.Human brain mapping · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lester Melie-GarciaLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-8916
David SlaterLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Anne RuefLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Gretel Sanabria-DiazLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Martin PreisigDepartment of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Ferath KherifLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Bogdan DraganskiLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
Antoine LuttiLREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks of anatomical covariance have been widely used to study connectivity patterns in both normal and pathological brains based on the concurrent changes of morphometric measures (i.e., cortical thickness) between brain structures across subjects (Evans, ). However, the existence of networks of microstructural changes within brain tissue has been largely unexplored so far. In this article, we studied in vivo the concurrent myelination processes among brain anatomical structures that gathered together emerge to form nonrandom networks. We name these "networks of myelin covariance" (Myelin-Nets). The Myelin-Nets were built from quantitative Magnetization Transfer data-an in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) marker of myelin content. The synchronicity of the variations in myelin content between anatomical regions was measured by computing the Pearson's correlation coefficient. We were especially interested in elucidating the effect of age on the topological organization of the Myelin-Nets. We therefore selected two age groups: Young-Age (20-31 years old) and Old-Age (60-71 years old) and a pool of participants from 48 to 87 years old for a Myelin-Nets aging trajectory study. We found that the topological organization of the Myelin-Nets is strongly shaped by aging processes. The global myelin correlation strength, between homologous regions and locally in different brain lobes, showed a significant dependence on age. Interestingly, we also showed that the aging process modulates the resilience of the Myelin-Nets to damage of principal network structures. In summary, this work sheds light on the organizational principles driving myelination and myelin degeneration in brain gray matter and how such patterns are modulated by aging.

Indexed as

AgingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyelin SheathAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeural Pathwaysagingbrain connectivitygraph theorymagnetization transfermyelinmyelinationprecuneusquantitative MRIstructural network

Identifiers

PMID29271053
PMCPMC5873432
OpenAlexW2780900244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.