Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270909›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2017

Sequential testing with different tissue transglutaminase antibodies, a new approach for diagnosis of celiac disease.

Giriprasad Venugopal, John Mechenro, Govind Makharia, Alka Singh, Srinivasan Pugazhendhi, Ramadass Balamurugan, Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A tandem approach of tTGA testing: A new approach for celiac disease screening.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giriprasad VenugopalSRM Institutes for Medical Science, 1, Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, Vadapalani, Chennai, 600 026, India.
John MechenroSRM Institutes for Medical Science, 1, Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, Vadapalani, Chennai, 600 026, India.
Govind MakhariaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Alka SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Srinivasan PugazhendhiKansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KA, USA.
Ramadass BalamuruganIndian Institute of Technology, Samantapuri, Bhubaneswar, 751 013, India.
Balakrishnan S RamakrishnaSRM Institutes for Medical Science, 1, Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, Vadapalani, Chennai, 600 026, India. wurama@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-7782
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar · INUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of celiac disease (CeD) in clinical practice relies on serological testing for IgA antibodies to human tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) which diagnose CeD autoimmunity. We compared three kits for their performance in diagnosis of the disease and evaluated the point prevalence of CeD autoimmunity in a South Indian urban population.

methodsIn the first part of the study, sera from 90 patients with documented CeD and 92 healthy controls were tested for anti-tTG using three different kits. One thousand nine hundred and seventeen healthy adults residing in urban areas of Vellore and Kancheepuram districts were tested for CeD autoimmunity using a sequential two-test strategy.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, false positivity, false negativity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the three assays respectively were as follows: 95.5%, 82.6%, 17.3%, 4.4%, 84.3%, and 95% for the Aeskulisa New Generation Assay; 85.5%, 100%, 0%, 14.4%, 100%, and 87.6% for Quanta Lite; and 71.1%, 100%, 0%, 28.8%, 100%, and 71% for Celiac Microlisa. The ROC curves showed good discrimination for all three ELISAs with an AUC of 0.947, 0.950, and 0.886 for the Aeskulisa, Quanta Lite, and Celiac Microlisa, respectively. Of 1917 (males 908, females 1009) healthy adults, 113 (5.89%) were seropositive for IgA anti-htTG in the Aeskulisa test. Two of the latter tested positive in the Quanta Lite assay and/or the Celiac Microlisa assay. The CeD autoimmunity prevalence in this urban population was 1.0 per thousand (95% confidence interval 0.3 to 3.7 per thousand).

conclusionSequential testing for anti-tTG using first a highly sensitive assay followed by a very specific assay is a new strategy for screening for CeD in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdolescentAdultBiomarkersCeliac DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AIndiaInfantMalePrevalenceSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersImmunoglobulin AReagent Kits, DiagnosticTransglutaminasesAnti-tTGCeliac diseaseELISAGlutenKappa coefficientNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueReceiver operating characteristics curveSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID29270909
OpenAlexW2781002911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.