ReviewThe AAPS journal2017
Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Human Tissue: Platforms to Evaluate Drug Metabolism and Safety.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging T cells for cancer immunotherapy.Immunity & inflammation · 2025Review
- The origins of human pluripotent stem cells: the road from a cancer to regenerative medicine.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2024Review
- Long-term cell fate and functional maintenance of human hepatocyte through stepwise culture configuration.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023Article
- Impact of DYRK1A Expression on TNNT2 Splicing and Daunorubicin Toxicity in Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2022Article
- Development of iPSC-based clinical trial selection platform for patients with ultrarare diseases.Science advances · 2022Article
- PXR-mediated idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: mechanistic insights and targeting approaches.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2020Review
- Hepatogenic Potential and Liver Regeneration Effect of Human Liver-derived Mesenchymal-Like Stem Cells.Cells · 2020Article
- hiPSC-Derived Neurons Provide a Robust and Physiologically RelevantFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The importance of transporters and cell polarization for the evaluation of human stem cell-derived hepatic cells.PloS one · 2020Article
- Scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized extracellular matrix.Biomaterials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the improvements in drug screening, high levels of drug attrition persist. Although high-throughput screening platforms permit the testing of compound libraries, poor compound efficacy or unexpected organ toxicity are major causes of attrition. Part of the reason for drug failure resides in the models employed, most of which are not representative of normal organ biology. This same problem affects all the major organs during drug development. Hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity are two interesting examples of organ disease and can present in the late stages of drug development, resulting in major cost and increased risk to the patient. Currently, cell-based systems used within industry rely on immortalized or primary cell lines from donated tissue. These models possess significant advantages and disadvantages, but in general display limited relevance to the organ of interest. Recently, stem cell technology has shown promise in drug development and has been proposed as an alternative to current industrial systems. These offerings will provide the field with exciting new models to study human organ biology at scale and in detail. We believe that the recent advances in production of stem cell-derived hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes combined with cutting-edge engineering technologies make them an attractive alternative to current screening models for drug discovery. This will lead to fast failing of poor drugs earlier in the process, delivering safer and more efficacious medicines for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.