ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018
Early outcomes of an enhanced recovery protocol for open repair of ventral hernia.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Consensus in ERAS protocols for ventral hernia repair: evidence-based recommendations from the ACHQC QI Committee.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Initial experience with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and early discharge protocols after robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Bridged repair of large ventral hernia defects using an ovine reinforced biologic: A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Comparative effectiveness of surgeon-performed transversus abdominis plane blocks and epidural catheters following open hernia repair with transversus abdominis release.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
- Recovery after laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- The contribution of specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol elements to reduced length of hospital stay after ventral hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) Combined with Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Enhanced value with implementation of an ERAS protocol for ventral hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgical repair of incisional hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based quality improvement pathways reported to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for open ventral hernia repair (VHR) before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol.
methodsAfter obtaining IRB approval, surgical databases were searched for VHR cases for two years prior and eleven months after protocol implementation for retrospective review. Groups were compared on perioperative characteristics and clinical outcomes using chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate.
resultsOne hundred and seventy-one patients underwent VHR (46 patients with ERAS protocol in place and 125 historic controls). Age, gender, ASA Class, comorbidities, and smoking status were similar between the two groups. Body mass index was lower among ERAS patients (p = .038). ERAS patients had earlier return of bowel function (median 3 vs. 4 days) (p = .003) and decreased incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (7 vs. 25%) (p = .008) than controls.
conclusionAn ERAS protocol for VHR demonstrated improved patient outcomes. A system-wide culture focused on enhanced recovery is needed to ensure improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29270803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.