Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270790›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2018

Budget Impact Analysis of Brivaracetam Adjunctive Therapy for Partial-Onset Epileptic Seizures in Valencia Community, Spain.

Isabel Barrachina-Martínez, David Vivas-Consuelo, Anna Piera-Balbastre

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel Barrachina-MartínezDepartament of Economics and Social Sciences. Research Centre for Health Economics and Management, INECO, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 7 J, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. ibarrach@upvnet.upv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-1190
David Vivas-ConsueloDepartament of Economics and Social Sciences. Research Centre for Health Economics and Management, INECO, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 7 J, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-7525
Anna Piera-BalbastreDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ingenieria Y Economia Del Transporte · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III - Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad FIS PI12/00037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMore than 30% of patients with epilepsy have inadequate control of seizures with drug therapy. The goal of this study is to determine the budget impact (BI) of the introduction of brivaracetam to the portfolio of approved drugs in Spain as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy in patients over 16 years old with a 5-year time horizon in the Valencia Community, a Spanish region with a population of 5 million.

methodsThe BI model compares the pharmaceutical expenditure on antiepileptics in two scenarios: with and without brivaracetam. It assumes that the introduction and increased use of brivaracetam will lead to a proportional decrease in consumption of coexisting adjunctive antiepileptics and calculates the evolution of the consumption of brivaracetam over 5 years (2016-2020). The model was designed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Data on the candidate population, consumption of antiepileptics, market share and pharmaceutical expenditure were obtained from real-world data. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was carried out on the set of variables involved in the evolution of costs using a Monte-Carlo simulation.

resultsThe model estimates that the target population eligible for adjunctive antiepileptics will hold at around 2352 between 2016 and 2020. Annual expenditure on antiepileptics is approximately €3.6 million. The number of patients eligible for treatment with brivaracetam would increase from 42 to 179 and annual savings of 0.09-0.37% would be created, representing €41,873 over 5 years (0.23% of the total budget). The sensitivity analysis corroborates that the probability of achieving savings with brivaracetam is around 84%.

conclusionsBrivaracetam is a therapeutic alternative that allows savings for the health system in patients with non-controlled epilepsy in monotherapy, having a fixed, predictable annual cost (independent of dose) from the first day of treatment as the lack of need for titration means the patient is within a range of therapeutic doses from the first dose.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsCost SavingsDrug CostsDrug Therapy, CombinationEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicMonte Carlo MethodPyrrolidinonesSpainAnticonvulsantsbrivaracetamPyrrolidinones

Identifiers

PMID29270790
OpenAlexW2780517151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.