Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270698›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2018

Goshajinkigan for reducing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nobuaki Hoshino, Riki Ganeko, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Summary of evidence on comprehensive healthcare for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Treatment strategy of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: a retrospective, nationwide study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Integrated Medicine for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nobuaki HoshinoDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. hoshinob@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-8971
Riki GanekoDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Koya HidaDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yoshiharu SakaiDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K10538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is common and presents with persistent and challenging symptoms for which there is no effective means of prevention. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of Goshajinkigan in the prevention of CIPN.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ICHUSHI. Randomised controlled trials comparing Goshajinkigan with an alternative strategy for preventing CIPN were selected.

resultsOf five studies included in the review, Goshajinkigan did not reduce the risk of CIPN when the common terminology criteria for adverse events was used [risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.57 for grade ≥2 CIPN and RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.59-2.00 for grade ≥3 CIPN]. When the neurotoxicity criteria of Debiopharm was used, Goshajinkigan tended to decrease the risk of CIPN, but not significantly (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33-1.64 for grade ≥2 CIPN and RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.28-1.52 for grade ≥3 CIPN).

conclusionsGoshajinkigan tended to prevent persistence but not severity of CIPN. Higher quality trials using multiple measures are needed in the future to clarify the preventive effect of Goshajinkigan and to assess the various aspects of CIPN.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsDrugs, Chinese Herbalgosha-jinki-ganChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyGoshajinkiganHerbal medicineSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29270698
OpenAlexW2781434826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.