Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270612›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Indirect vs Direct Voice Therapy for Children With Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christopher Hartnick, Catherine Ballif, Vanessa De Guzman, Robert Sataloff, Paolo Campisi, Joseph Kerschner, Adrianna Shembel, Domenic Reda, Helen Shi, Elinore Sheryka Zacny and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01255735 completednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of Voice on Children With Vocal Nodules

TypeobservationalSponsorMassachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryRan2011 to 2016Enrolled114ConditionsVocal Fold Nodules
NCT05878197 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Therapy on the Phonation of Children With Vocal Fold Nodules.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2019 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsVoice Disorders in Children, Vocal Nodules in Children, Hoarseness, DysphoniaArmsStraw phonation, Resonant voice therapy, Vocal Hygiene
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Instrumental Voice Evaluation in Children: What Are We Getting?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Retrospective Study of Glottic Cyst Histopathology and Its Clinical Presentation.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Cognitive Mechanisms in Pediatric Voice Therapy - An Initial Examination.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Clinical Case Study: Pediatric Bilateral Benign Vocal Fold Lesions.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023
    Article
  8. [Clinical analysis of 102 cases of pediatric vocal fold nodules].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Pediatric Voice Therapy: How Many Sessions to Discharge?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Relative Fundamental Frequency in Children With and Without Vocal Fold Nodules.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher HartnickMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston.
Catherine BallifMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston.
Vanessa De GuzmanMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston.
Robert SataloffDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Paolo CampisiHospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph KerschnerMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Adrianna ShembelMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston.
Domenic RedaHines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois.
Helen ShiHines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois.
Elinore Sheryka ZacnyHines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois.
Glenn BuntingMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USDrexel University · USHospital for Sick Children · CAMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Benign vocal fold nodules affect 12% to 22% of the pediatric population, and 95% of otolaryngologists recommend voice therapy as treatment. However, no randomized clinical trials that we are aware of have shown its benefits. Objective: To determine the impact of voice therapy in children with vocal fold nodules according to pretherapy and posttherapy scores on the Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life (PVRQOL) survey; secondary objectives included changes in phonatory parameters. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this multicenter randomized clinical trial, 114 children ages 6 to 10 years with vocal fold nodules, PVRQOL scores less than 87.5, and dysphonia for longer than 12 weeks were recruited from outpatient voice and speech clinics. This age range was identified because these patients have not experienced pubertal changes of the larynx, tolerate stroboscopy, and cooperate with voice therapy. Participants were blinded to treatment arm. Interventions: Participants received either indirect or direct therapy for 8 to 12 weeks. Indirect therapy focused on education and discussion of voice principles, while direct treatment used the stimulus, response, antecedent paradigm. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was PVRQOL score change before and after treatment. Secondary phonatory measures were also compared. Results: Overall, 114 children were recruited for study (mean [SD] age, 8 [1.4] years; 83 males [73%]); with 57 randomized to receive either indirect or direct therapy. Both direct and indirect therapy approaches showed significant differences in PVRQOL scores pretherapy to posttherapy. The mean increase in PVRQOL score for direct therapy was 19.2, and 14.7 for indirect therapy (difference, 4.5; 95.3% CI, -10.8 to 19.8). Of 44 participants in the direct therapy group, 27 (61%) achieved a clinically meaningful PVRQOL improvement, compared with 26 of 49 (53%) for indirect therapy (difference, 8%; 95% CI, -12 to 28). Post hoc stratification showed robust effects in the direct therapy group for older children (Cohen d = 0.50) and the latter two-thirds of participants (Cohen d = 0.46). Vocal fold nodules reduced in size in 31% (22 of 70) and completely resolved in 11% (8 of 70) of participants who consented to a second set of images after going through the recruitment process. Conclusions and Relevance: Both direct and indirect voice therapy improved voice-related quality of life in children with vocal fold nodules, although there was no significant difference between approaches. Future studies may focus upon which voice therapy approaches are effective in treating age-defined populations. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01255735.

Indexed as

Vocal CordsVoice TrainingChildFemaleHumansLaryngeal DiseasesMalePatient CompliancePhonationQuality of LifeVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID29270612
PMCPMC5839292
OpenAlexW2776941158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.