Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270300›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2017

Center Variation and the Effect of Center and Provider Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Anne Tsampalieros, Gregory A Knoll, Nicholas Fergusson, Alexandria Bennett, Monica Taljaard, Dean Fergusson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant-Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Kidney Transplant Center Volume With 3-Year Clinical Outcomes.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne TsampalierosClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Gregory A KnollClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Nicholas FergussonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandria BennettClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Dean FergussonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. While patient-level factors affecting survival are established, the presence of variation in the management of transplant recipients remains unknown.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine center variation in kidney transplantation and identify center and provider characteristics that may be associated with clinical outcomes.

designThis is a systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to June 2016 were used. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: Any study examining the association between center or provider characteristics and graft or patient survival, quality of life, or functional status were included.

resultsWe identified 6327 records and 24 studies met eligibility. Most studies used data registries. Characteristics evaluated include center volume (n = 17), provider volume (n = 2), provider experience (n = 1), center type (n = 2), and location of follow-up (n = 1). Outcomes assessed included graft survival (n = 24) and patient survival (n = 9). Significant center variation was described in 12 of 15 and 5 of 7 studies for graft and patient survival. There was a significant and positive association between center volume and graft and patient survival in 8 and 2 studies, respectively. Provider experience and volume were significantly associated with less allograft loss and provider volume with lower risk of death. There was no association between graft survival and location of follow-up or center type. LIMITATIONS: There was substantial heterogeneity in the variables assessed and methodology used to analyze associations.

conclusionThis systematic review found center variation in kidney transplantation. Future studies in the current era are necessary to better evaluate this important topic.

Indexed as

allograft survivalcenter variationkidney transplantationquality of life

Identifiers

PMID29270300
PMCPMC5731624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.