ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2017
Attending Physician Remote Access of the Electronic Health Record and Implications for Resident Supervision: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived benefits and barriers of medical doctors regarding electronic medical record systems in an Indian private-sector healthcare facility.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Measuring cognitive effort using tabular transformer-based language models of electronic health record-based audit log action sequences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Using electronic health record audit log data for research: insights from early efforts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Conceptual considerations for using EHR-based activity logs to measure clinician burnout and its effects.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Value and Usage of a Workaround Artifact: A Cognitive Work Analysis of "Brains" Use by Hospital Nurses.Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making · 2019Article
- Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Documenting or Operating: Where Is Time Spent in General Surgery Residency?Journal of surgical education · 2018Article
- Supervision Is Not Education: The Dark Side of Remote Access to the Electronic Health Record.Journal of graduate medical education · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in information technology have increased remote access to the electronic health record (EHR). Concurrently, standards defining appropriate resident supervision have evolved. How often and under what circumstances inpatient attending physicians remotely access the EHR for resident supervision is unknown.
objectiveWe described a model of attending remote EHR use for resident supervision, and quantified the frequency and magnitude of use.
methodsUsing a mixed methods approach, general medicine inpatient attendings were surveyed and interviewed about their remote EHR use. Frequency of use and supervisory actions were quantitatively examined via survey. Transcripts from semistructured interviews were analyzed using grounded theory to identify codes and themes.
resultsA total of 83% (59 of 71) of attendings participated. Fifty-seven (97%) reported using the EHR remotely, with 54 (92%) reporting they discovered new clinical information not relayed by residents via remote EHR use. A majority (93%, 55 of 59) reported that this resulted in management changes, and 54% (32 of 59) reported making immediate changes by contacting cross-covering teams. Six major factors around remote EHR use emerged: resident, clinical, educational, personal, technical, and administrative. Attendings described resident and clinical factors as facilitating "backstage" supervision via remote EHR use.
conclusionsIn our study to assess attending remote EHR use for resident supervision, attendings reported frequent remote use with resulting supervisory actions, describing a previously uncharacterized form of "backstage" oversight supervision. Future work should explore best practices in remote EHR use to provide effective supervision and ultimately improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.