Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270235›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2017

The repetitive landscape of the 5100 Mbp barley genome.

Thomas Wicker, Alan H Schulman, Jaakko Tanskanen, Manuel Spannagl, Sven Twardziok, Martin Mascher, Nathan M Springer, Qing Li, Robbie Waugh, Chengdao Li and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Core promoterome of barley embryo.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The nature and organization of satellite DNAs inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Thomas WickerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Alan H SchulmanInstitute of Biotechnology and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaakko TanskanenInstitute of Biotechnology and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Manuel SpannaglPGSB - Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sven TwardziokPGSB - Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Martin MascherLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Seeland, Germany.
Nathan M SpringerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Qing LiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Robbie WaughThe James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.
Chengdao LiWestern Barley Genetics Alliance/the State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA6150 Australia.
Guoping ZhangCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Wuhan, ZU China.
Nils SteinLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Seeland, Germany.
Klaus F X MayerPGSB - Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Heidrun GundlachPGSB - Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Minnesota · USGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEJames Hutton Institute · GBLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DEMurdoch University · AUNatural Resources Institute Finland · FITechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile transposable elements (TEs) comprise the bulk of plant genomic DNA, how they contribute to genome structure and organization is still poorly understood. Especially in large genomes where TEs make the majority of genomic DNA, it is still unclear whether TEs target specific chromosomal regions or whether they simply accumulate where they are best tolerated.

resultsHere, we present an analysis of the repetitive fraction of the 5100 Mb barley genome, the largest angiosperm genome to have a near-complete sequence assembly. Genes make only about 2% of the genome, while over 80% is derived from TEs. The TE fraction is composed of at least 350 different families. However, 50% of the genome is comprised of only 15 high-copy TE families, while all other TE families are present in moderate or low copy numbers. We found that the barley genome is highly compartmentalized with different types of TEs occupying different chromosomal "niches", such as distal, interstitial, or proximal regions of chromosome arms. Furthermore, gene space represents its own distinct genomic compartment that is enriched in small non-autonomous DNA transposons, suggesting that these TEs specifically target promoters and downstream regions. Furthermore, their presence in gene promoters is associated with decreased methylation levels.

conclusionsOur data show that TEs are major determinants of overall chromosome structure. We hypothesize that many of the the various chromosomal distribution patterns are the result of TE families targeting specific niches, rather than them accumulating where they have the least deleterious effects.

Identifiers

PMID29270235
PMCPMC5738225
OpenAlexW2777772122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.