Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29270231›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2017

Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment.

Eugena Stamuli, David Torgerson, Matthew Northgraves, Sarah Ronaldson, Lindsey Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Preferences for Longer or More Frequent In-Center Hemodialysis Regimens: A Multicenter Discrete Choice Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eugena StamuliYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4905-3704
David TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Matthew NorthgravesYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Sarah RonaldsonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Lindsey CherrySolent NHS Trust & University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences, B45, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.

Funding

Department of Health CAT-CL-03-2012-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to establish the preferences of people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) about the best outcome measure for a health and fitness intervention randomised controlled trial (RCT). The results of this study were used to inform the choice of the trial primary and secondary outcome measure.

methodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess people's preferences regarding a number of outcomes (foot and ankle pain, fatigue, mobility, ability to perform daily activities, choice of footwear) as well as different schedules and frequency of delivery for the health and fitness intervention. The outcomes were chosen based on literature review, clinician recommendation and patients' focus groups. The DCE was constructed in SAS software using the D-efficiency criteria. It compared hypothetical scenarios with varying levels of outcomes severity and intervention schedule. Preference weights were estimated using appropriate econometric models. The partial log-likelihood method was used to assess the attribute importance.

resultsOne hundred people with RA completed 18 choice sets. Overall, people selected foot and ankle pain as the most important outcome, with mobility being nearly as important. There was no evidence of differential preference between intervention schedules or frequency of delivery.

conclusionsFoot and ankle pain can be considered the patient choice for primary outcome of an RCT relating to a health and fitness intervention. This study demonstrated that, by using the DCE method, it is possible to incorporate patients' preferences at the design stage of a RCT. This approach ensures patient involvement at early stages of health care design.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidChoice BehaviorExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient PreferenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultChoice of outcome measureDiscrete choice experimentRandomized clinical trialRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID29270231
PMCPMC5732456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.