ArticlePlant methods2017
Evaluation of parameters affecting switchgrass tissue culture: toward a consolidated procedure for
Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Potential of NGTs to Overcome Constraints in Plant Breeding and Their Regulatory Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Expression of mastitis causing fibrinogen binding protein of gram positive bacteria in genetically engineered switchgrass and antibodies production in mice.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Article
- An Agrobacterium strain auxotrophic for methionine is useful for switchgrass transformation.Transgenic research · 2022Article
- Iron incorporation both intra- and extra-cellularly improves the yield and saccharification of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) biomass.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Expression of a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB) reduces lignin and improves biomass saccharification efficiency in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.).BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Genetic Transformation of Apomictic Grasses: Progress and Constraints.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Genetic Transformation of Recalcitrant Upland Switchgrass Using Morphogenic Genes.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- RETRACTED: Green fabricated zinc oxide nanoformulated media enhanced callus induction and regeneration dynamics of Panicum virgatum L.PloS one · 2020Article
- Robust and ReproducibleFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Embryogenic cell suspensions for high-capacity genetic transformation and regeneration of switchgrass (Biotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSwitchgrass (
resultsAfter evaluating the published protocols, we consolidated these approaches and optimized the process to develop a more efficient protocol for producing transgenic switchgrass. First, seed sterilization was optimized, which led to a 20% increase in yield of induced calluses. Second, we have selected a N
conclusionThe process for switchgrass transformation has been evaluated and consolidated to devise an improved approach for transgenic switchgrass production. With the optimization of seed sterilization, callus induction, and regeneration steps, a reliable and effective protocol is established to facilitate switchgrass engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.