ArticleInternational journal of MS care
Alemtuzumab in Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons from Social Media in Enhancing Patient Care.
Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reporting of Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research Utilizing Social Media Data on Public Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Online peer support for people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): a narrative synthesis systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Methods for Analyzing the Contents of Social Media for Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Web-Based Peer Support Interventions for Adults Living With Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2021Article
- Online Peer Support for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Synthesis Systematic Review.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that has been approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Alemtuzumab is associated with infusion reactions and potential autoimmune complications. Patient education and understanding are crucial to favorable outcomes. Our objective was to observe communication on a peer-to-peer Facebook group for content, accuracy of posts, and number of "likes" per post and to compare shared themes to current approved prescribing information and educational modules.
methodsWe identified a Facebook group specific to alemtuzumab in MS. A 14-day window was observed. Posts were classified as "sharing" or "seeking information." Content analysis was used for information-seeking posts. Accuracy of replies was compared with product prescribing information.
resultsWe reviewed 458 posts. Members contemplating receiving or currently receiving alemtuzumab primarily used Facebook for information gathering (54.6%), followed by seeking emotional support and sharing personal experiences (45.4%). Most shared experiences (83.6%) were positive. Themes for information were predominantly consistent with standard protocols. Complications discussed included infection (15.50%), bone pain (11.80%), immune thrombocytopenia (8.07%), and fatigue (7.46%). Accuracy of replies was consistent with product information except for immune thrombocytopenia.
conclusionsSome patients with MS look to online groups for discussion, peer support, and information. Although written guidelines on the studied home page reinforce that online discussion "does not replace medical advice," inaccurate information does occur. Health-care providers' reviews of these online sites allow insight into the real-world experiences of patients receiving alemtuzumab, with potential for modification of educational approaches by health-care professionals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.