Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29269955›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2017

Update Breast Cancer 2017 - Implementation of Novel Therapies.

Michael P Lux, Wolfgang Janni, Andreas D Hartkopf, Naiba Nabieva, Florin-Andrei Taran, Friedrich Overkamp, Hans-Christian Kolberg, Peyman Hadji, Hans Tesch, Johannes Ettl and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Michael P LuxErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Naiba NabievaErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Friedrich OverkampOncologianova GmbH, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Hans-Christian KolbergMarienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
Peyman HadjiDepartment of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hans TeschOncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Johannes EttlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens B HuoberDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Diana LüftnerCharité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Erik BellevilleClinSol GmbH & Co. KG, Würzburg, Germany.
Tanja N FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diethelm WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEMarienhospital Bottrop · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, numerous new therapy options for patients with breast cancer have been developed in clinical studies, with some options already approved for routine treatment. As the speed at which innovations are introduced increases, the importance of conferences also increases, as conferences are where the data underpinning new therapies are usually presented for the first time. This review looks at publications of the ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) and ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology) conferences in 2017, summarizes them and evaluates them in the context of existing data. The focus is on new insights for neoadjuvant therapy and new treatment options in the metastatic setting, such as the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors or PARP inhibitors. The first results of treatments with checkpoint inhibitors are presented. With the patent expiry of trastuzumab, a number of study results for trastuzumab biosimilars have also been published. The digitization of patient care provides the first results on quality of life and prognosis of patients with advanced cancer. Digital communications between patients and physicians are being evaluated in several studies in Germany. As the discussion about patient-relevant endpoints for patients in the metastatic setting continues, overall survival rates from studies of big endocrine-based therapies are urgently needed. Preliminary analyses of small study cohorts offer initial insights. In the context of improving patient care, in the coming years, questions will center on which patients particularly benefit from certain therapies and which patients need particular protection from specific side effects. Questions about these predictors are raised in many scientific projects as attention increasingly focuses on this topic.

Indexed as

breast cancerlocal recurrencemetastasesstudiestreatment

Identifiers

PMID29269955
PMCPMC5734938
OpenAlexW2776036154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.